Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Logics of False Belief and Radical Ignorance

Published 11 Apr 2024 in math.LO and cs.LO | (2404.07442v1)

Abstract: In the literature, the question about how to axiomatize the transitive logic of false belief is thought of as hard and left as an open problem. In this paper, among other contributions, we deal with this problem. In more details, although the standard doxastic operator is undefinable with the operator of false belief, the former is {\em almost definable} with the latter. On one hand, the involved almost definability schema guides us to find the desired core axioms for the transitive logic and the Euclidean logic of false belief. On the other hand, inspired by the schema and other considerations, we propose a suitable canonical relation, which can uniformly handle the completeness proof of various logics of false belief, including the transitive logic. We also extend the results to the logic of radical ignorance, due to the interdefinability of the operators of false belief and radical ignorance.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. Sophie-Grace Chappell. Plato on Knowledge in the Theaetetus. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Winter 2019 edition, 2019.
  2. J. Fan. Bimodal logics with contingency and accident. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48:425–445, 2019.
  3. J. Fan. A logic for disjunctive ignorance. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 50(6):1293–1312, 2021.
  4. J. Fan. Logics of (in)sane and (un)reliable beliefs. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 30(1):78–100, 2022.
  5. J. Fan. Unknown truths and false beliefs: Completeness and expressivity results for the neighborhood semantics. Studia Logica, 110:1–45, 2022.
  6. J. Fan. Some notes on dyadic contingency. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 32(2):209–217, 2023.
  7. Almost necessary. In Advances in Modal Logic, volume 10, pages 178–196, 2014.
  8. Contingency and knowing whether. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 8(1):75–107, 2015.
  9. V. Fano and P. Graziani. A working hypothesis for the logic of radical ignorance. Synthese, pages 1–16, 2020.
  10. D. Gilbert and G. Venturi. Neighborhood semantics for logics of unknown truths and false beliefs. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 14(1):246–267, 2017.
  11. E. and Petrolo M. and Venturi G. Gilbert, D. and Kubyshkina. Logics of ignorance and being wrong. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 30(5):870–885, 2022.
  12. K. H. Onishi and R. Baillargeon. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719):255–258, 2005.
  13. T. Pan and C. Yang. A logic for weak essence and strong accident. Logique et Analyse, 238:179–190, 2017.
  14. C. Steinsvold. Being wrong: Logics for false belief. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 52(3):245–253, 2011.
  15. T. Witczak. A note on the intuitionistic logic of false belief. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 51(1):57–71, 2022.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.