Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Phonon-induced contrast in a matter-wave interferometer

Published 5 Apr 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.mes-hall | (2404.04210v2)

Abstract: Utilizing the Stern-Gerlach apparatus to create matter-wave superposition states is a long-sought-after goal, not only due to its potential applications in the quantum realm but also because of its fundamental implications for studying the quantum properties of gravity. The main challenge in creating a macroscopic quantum interferometer arises from the loss of coherence, primarily through two channels. One channel involves strong coupling with the environment for macroscopic matter, leading to decoherence. The other channel relates to the precision of wave packet overlap, which can occur due to external and internal fluctuations of various sources. The latter introduces a unique challenge for larger-scale masses by perturbing the centre of mass motion of the macroscopic object. Here, we study a particular challenge, namely, the issue of internal degrees of freedom, specifically phonon fluctuations and contrast reduction. This work will investigate the contrast reduction caused by spin-magnetic field and diamagnetic interactions at the phonon occupation level in the quantum gravity-induced entanglement of masses (QGEM) protocol configuration.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. R. Penrose, Gen. Rel. Grav. 28, 581 (1996).
  2. L. Diósi, Phys. Lett. A 129, 419 (1988), arXiv:1812.11591 [quant-ph] .
  3. P. M. Pearle, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989).
  4. S. Nimmrichter and K. Hornberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 160403 (2013).
  5. O. Romero-Isart, Phys. Rev. A 84, 052121 (2011).
  6. R. Y. Chiao and A. D. Speliotopoulos, J. Mod. Opt. 51, 861 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0312096 .
  7. G. M. Tino et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 73, 228 (2019), arXiv:1907.03867 [astro-ph.IM] .
  8. S. Bose, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fv-0k13s_k  (2016), accessed 1/11/22, on behalf of QGEM collaboration.
  9. C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017).
  10. S. G. Elahi and A. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035018 (2023), arXiv:2303.07371 [gr-qc] .
  11. M. Christodoulou et al.,   (2022), arXiv:2202.03368 .
  12. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
  13. B. Friedrich and H. Schmidt-Böcking,  (2021).
  14. Y. Margalit et al.,   (2020), 10.1126/sciadv.abg2879, arXiv:2011.10928 [quant-ph] .
  15. M. Schlosshauer, Phys. Rept. 831, 1 (2019), arXiv:1911.06282 [quant-ph] .
  16. A. Großardt, Phys. Rev. A 102, 040202 (2020).
  17. B.-G. Englert, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 52, 13 (1997).
  18. Y. Japha and R. Folman,   (2022), arXiv:2202.10535 .
  19. C. Henkel and R. Folman, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 025602 (2022), arXiv:2112.01263 [quant-ph] .
  20. C. Henkel and R. Folman,   (2023), arXiv:2305.15230 [quant-ph] .
  21. Jishi, Radi A,  (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
  22. W. B. Case, American Journal of Physics 76, 937 (2008), https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article-pdf/76/10/937/13118327/937_1_online.pdf .
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.