Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Extending direct data-driven predictive control towards systems with finite control sets

Published 3 Apr 2024 in eess.SY, cs.SY, and math.OC | (2404.02727v2)

Abstract: Although classical model predictive control with finite control sets (FCS-MPC) is quite a popular control method, particularly in the realm of power electronics systems, its direct data-driven predictive control (FCS-DPC) counterpart has received relatively limited attention. In this paper, we introduce a novel reformulation of a commonly used DPC scheme that allows for the application of a modified sphere decoding algorithm, known for its efficiency and prominence in FCS-MPC applications. We test the reformulation on a popular electrical drive example and compare the computation times of sphere decoding FCS-DPC with an enumeration-based and a MIQP method.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. E. Zafra, S. Vazquez, T. Geyer, R. P. Aguilera, and L. G. Franquelo, “Long prediction horizon FCS-MPC for power converters and drives,” IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, pp. 159–175, 2023.
  2. L. Huang, J. Zhen, J. Lygeros, and F. Dörfler, “Quadratic regularization of data-enabled predictive control: Theory and application to power converter experiments,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 192–197, 2021.
  3. J. Coulson, J. Lygeros, and F. Dörfler, “Data-enabled predictive control: In the shallows of the DeePC,” 18th European Control Conference, pp. 307–312, 2019.
  4. J. Berberich and F. Allgöwer, “A trajectory-based framework for data-driven system analysis and control,” 2020 European Control Conference, pp. 1365–1370, 2020.
  5. F. Dörfler, J. Coulson, and I. Markovsky, “Bridging direct and indirect data-driven control formulations via regularizations and relaxations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 883–897, 2023.
  6. J. Coulson, J. Lygeros, and F. Dörfler, “Regularized and distributionally robust data-enabled predictive control,” 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2696–2701, 2019.
  7. J. Berberich, J. Köhler, M. Müller, and F. Allgöwer, “Data-driven model predictive control with stability and robustness guarantees,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1702–1717, 2021.
  8. M. Klädtke and M. Schulze Darup, “Implicit predictors in regularized data-driven predictive control,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 2479–2484, 2023.
  9. C. Muller, D. E. Quevedo, and G. C. Goodwin, “How good is quantized model predictive control with horizon one?” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2623–2638, 2011.
  10. A. H. Land and A. G. Doig, “An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems,” Econometrica, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 497–520, 1960.
  11. T. Geyer and D. E. Quevedo, “Multistep finite control set model predictive control for power electronics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6836–6846, 2014.
  12. I. Markovsky and F. Dörfler, “Identifiability in the behavioral setting,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1667–1677, 2023.
  13. J. C. Willems, P. Rapisarda, I. Markovsky, and B. L. De Moor, “A note on persistency of excitation,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 325–329, 2005.
  14. I. Markovsky and P. Rapisarda, “Data-driven simulation and control,” International Journal of Control, vol. 81, pp. 1946 – 1959, 2008.
  15. P. Mattsson and T. B. Schön, “On the regularization in DeePC*,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 625–631, 2023, 22nd IFAC World Congress.
  16. W. Favoreel, B. De Moor, and M. Gevers, “SPC: Subspace predictive control,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 4004–4009, 1999, 14th IFAC World Congress 1999, Beijing, China.
  17. F. Fiedler and S. Lucia, “On the relationship between data-enabled predictive control and subspace predictive control,” in 2021 European Control Conference, 2021, pp. 222–229.
  18. T. Geyer and D. E. Quevedo, “Multistep direct model predictive control for power electronics — part 2: Analysis,” in 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, 2013, pp. 1162–1169.
  19. B. Stellato, T. Geyer, and P. J. Goulart, “High-speed finite control set model predictive control for power electronics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 4007–4020, 2017.
  20. B. Stellato, V. V. Naik, A. Bemporad, P. Goulart, and S. Boyd, “Embedded mixed-integer quadratic optimization using the OSQP solver,” in European Control Conference, Jul. 2018.
  21. The MathWorks Inc., “Matlab version: 9.14.0 (r2023a),” Natick, Massachusetts, United States, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.