Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Renormalization of Complex Networks with Partition Functions

Published 12 Mar 2024 in cond-mat.stat-mech and physics.soc-ph | (2403.07402v1)

Abstract: While renormalization groups are fundamental in physics, renormalization of complex networks remains vague in its conceptual definition and methodology. Here, we propose a novel strategy to renormalize complex networks. Rather than resorting to handling the bare structure of a network, we overlay it with a readily renormalizable physical model, which reflects real-world scenarios with a broad generality. From the renormalization of the overlying system, we extract a rigorous and simple renormalization group transformation of arbitrary networks. In this way, we obtain a transparent, model-dependent physical meaning of the network renormalization, which in our case is a scale transformation preserving the transition dynamics of low-density particles. We define the strength of a node in accordance with the physical model and trace the change of its distribution under our renormalization process. This analysis demonstrates that the strength distributions of scale-free networks remain scale-invariant, whereas those of homogeneous random networks do not.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. M. E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 597 (1974).
  2. K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  3. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group (Westview Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1992).
  4. K. Christensen and N. R. Moloney, Complexity And Criticality, Imperial College Press Advanced Physics Texts (Imperial College Press, London, England, 2005).
  5. M. E. J. Newman, Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2018).
  6. P. Holme, Nature Communications 10, 1016 (2019).
  7. M. P. H. Stumpf and M. A. Porter, Science 335, 665 (2012), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1216142 .
  8. B. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 168701 (2004).
  9. D. Gfeller and P. De Los Rios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 038701 (2007).
  10. M. Nurisso, M. Morandini, M. Lucas, F. Vaccarino, T. Gili,  and G. Petri, “Higher-order Laplacian renormalization,”  (2024), arXiv:2401.11298 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
  11. J. F. C. Kingman, Journal of Applied Probability 6, 1 (1969).
  12. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, London, England, 2007).
  13. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.286.5439.509 .
  14. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002).
  15. P. Erdös and A. Rényi, Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen 6, 290 (1959).
  16. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 13 likes about this paper.