Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 27 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 70 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 117 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 459 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Reappraisal of SU(3)-flavor breaking in $B\rightarrow DP$ (2403.04878v2)

Published 7 Mar 2024 in hep-ph and hep-ex

Abstract: In light of recently found deviations of the experimental data from predictions from QCD factorization for $B_{(s)}\rightarrow D_{(s)}P$ decays, where $P={\pi,K}$, we systematically probe the current status of the SU(3)$_F$ expansion from a fit to experimental branching ratio data without any further theory input. We find that the current data are in agreement with the power counting of the SU(3)$_F$ expansion. While the SU(3)$_F$ limit is excluded at $>5\sigma$, amplitude-level SU(3)$_F$-breaking contributions of $\sim 20\%$ suffice for an excellent description of the data. SU(3)$_F$ breaking is needed in tree ($>5\sigma$) and color-suppressed tree ($2.4\sigma$) diagrams. We are not yet sensitive to SU(3)$_F$ breaking in exchange diagrams. From the underlying SU(3)$_F$ parametrization we predict the unmeasured branching ratios $\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}_s0\rightarrow \pi- D+) = 2 \mathcal{B}(\overline{B}_s0\rightarrow \pi0 D0) = [0.3, 7.2] \times 10{-6}$ of suppressed decays that can be searched for at the LHCb experiment.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. M. L. Piscopo and A. V. Rusov, JHEP 10, 180 (2023), arXiv:2307.07594 [hep-ph] .
  2. S. Iguro and T. Kitahara, Phys. Rev. D 102, 071701 (2020), arXiv:2008.01086 [hep-ph] .
  3. R. Fleischer and E. Malami, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056004 (2022), arXiv:2109.04950 [hep-ph] .
  4. J. F. Krohn et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 107, 012003 (2023), arXiv:2207.00134 [hep-ex] .
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 10, 106 (2023), arXiv:2308.00587 [hep-ex] .
  6. E. Waheed et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 105, 012003 (2022), arXiv:2111.04978 [hep-ex] .
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. D 104, 032005 (2021a), arXiv:2103.06810 [hep-ex] .
  8. A. Lenz and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, JHEP 07, 177 (2020), arXiv:1912.07621 [hep-ph] .
  9. J. Brod and J. Zupan, JHEP 01, 051 (2014), arXiv:1308.5663 [hep-ph] .
  10. M. Gronau and D. London, Phys. Lett. B 253, 483 (1991).
  11. M. Gronau and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 265, 172 (1991).
  12. A. Bondar, in BINP special analysis meeting on Dalitz analysis, Sep. 24–26 (2002) unpublished.
  13. A. Poluektov et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 70, 072003 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0406067 .
  14. A. Bondar and A. Poluektov, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 347 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0510246 .
  15. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  16. A. Poluektov, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 121 (2018), arXiv:1712.08326 [hep-ph] .
  17. The CKMfitter Group, “Updated Results on the CKM Matrix,”  (2021), http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/www/results/plots_spring21/num/ckmEval_results_spring21.html.
  18. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb),  (2018), arXiv:1808.08865 [hep-ex] .
  19. I. Dunietz, Phys. Lett. B 427, 179 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9712401 .
  20. R. Fleischer, Nucl. Phys. B 671, 459 (2003a), arXiv:hep-ph/0304027 .
  21. R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B 562, 234 (2003b), arXiv:hep-ph/0301255 .
  22. C.-K. Chua and W.-S. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 116001 (2008), arXiv:0712.1882 [hep-ph] .
  23. D. Zeppenfeld, Z. Phys. C 8, 77 (1981).
  24. M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3346 (1989), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 40, 3127 (1989)].
  25. C.-W. Chiang and E. Senaha, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074021 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0702007 .
  26. M. Jung and T. Mannel, Phys. Rev. D 80, 116002 (2009), arXiv:0907.0117 [hep-ph] .
  27. P. Colangelo and R. Ferrandes, Phys. Lett. B 627, 77 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0508033 .
  28. B. Grinstein and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6344 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9602218 .
  29. M. Neubert and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B 519, 50 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0108103 .
  30. Z.-z. Xing, HEPNP 26, 100 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0107257 .
  31. H.-Y. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094012 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0108096 .
  32. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 69, 016006 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0309166 .
  33. C.-W. Chiang and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 67, 074013 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0212274 .
  34. Z.-z. Xing, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 63 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0301024 .
  35. H. Yamamoto,   (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9403255 .
  36. Z.-z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 364, 55 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9507310 .
  37. Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV), Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023b), arXiv:2206.07501 [hep-ex] .
  38. K. Abe et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 111801 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0104051 .
  39. S. Ahmed et al. (CLEO), Phys. Rev. D 66, 031101 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0206030 .
  40. P. Krokovny et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 141802 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0212066 .
  41. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 69, 032004 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0310028 .
  42. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 75, 031101 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0610027 .
  43. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 74, 111102 (2006a), arXiv:hep-ex/0609033 .
  44. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 74, 031101 (2006b), arXiv:hep-ex/0604016 .
  45. Y. Horii et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 78, 071901 (2008), arXiv:0804.2063 [hep-ex] .
  46. J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 84, 112007 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 039901 (2013)], arXiv:1107.5751 [hep-ex] .
  47. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 04, 001 (2013), arXiv:1301.5286 [hep-ex] .
  48. Y. Kato et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 97, 012005 (2018), arXiv:1709.06108 [hep-ex] .
  49. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 04, 081 (2021b), arXiv:2012.09903 [hep-ex] .
  50. T. Bloomfield et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 105, 072007 (2022), arXiv:2111.12337 [hep-ex] .
  51. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat] .

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com