Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
135 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Umwelt: Accessible Structured Editing of Multimodal Data Representations (2403.00106v2)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: We present Umwelt, an authoring environment for interactive multimodal data representations. In contrast to prior approaches, which center the visual modality, Umwelt treats visualization, sonification, and textual description as coequal representations: they are all derived from a shared abstract data model, such that no modality is prioritized over the others. To simplify specification, Umwelt evaluates a set of heuristics to generate default multimodal representations that express a dataset's functional relationships. To support smoothly moving between representations, Umwelt maintains a shared query predicated that is reified across all modalities -- for instance, navigating the textual description also highlights the visualization and filters the sonification. In a study with 5 blind / low-vision expert users, we found that Umwelt's multimodal representations afforded complementary overview and detailed perspectives on a dataset, allowing participants to fluidly shift between task- and representation-oriented ways of thinking.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. 2017. SAS Graphics Accelerator. https://support.sas.com/software/products/graphics-accelerator/index.html
  2. Alice Wong and Ed Yong. 2022. What Counts as Seeing. Orion Magazine (2022). https://orionmagazine.org/article/ed-yong-alice-wong-interview/
  3. Tactile Graphics with a Voice. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8, 1 (Jan. 2016), 3:1–3:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2854005
  4. Tactile graphics with a voice: using QR codes to access text in tactile graphics. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility (ASSETS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661366
  5. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Galway Ireland, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348
  6. Cognitive Dimensions of Notations: Design Tools for Cognitive Technology. In Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Meurig Beynon, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, and Kerstin Dautenhahn (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44617-6_31
  7. Olli: An Extensible Visualization Library for Screen Reader Accessibility. In IEEE VIS Posters. http://vis.csail.mit.edu/pubs/olli/
  8. Who Do We Mean When We Talk About Visualization Novices?. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581524
  9. Highcharts Sonification Studio: An Online, Open-Source, Extensible, and Accessible Data Sonification Tool. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2021). International Community for Auditory Display, Virtual Conference, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2021.005
  10. E F Codd. 1971. Further Normalization of the Data Base Relational Model. Technical Report RJ909. IBM, San Jose, California.
  11. Scott Davert and AppleVis Editorial Team. 2019. What’s New In iOS 13 Accessibility For Individuals Who Are Blind or Deaf-Blind. https://www.applevis.com/blog/whats-new-ios-13-accessibility-individuals-who-are-blind-or-deaf-blind
  12. Doug Schepers. 2022. Designing Data for Cognitive Load. In Centering Accessibility in Data Visualization, Jonathan Schwabish, Sue Popkin, and Alice Feng (Eds.). Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/Do%20No%20Harm%20Guide%20Centering%20Accessibility%20in%20Data%20Visualization.pdf
  13. SVGPlott: an accessible tool to generate highly adaptable, accessible audio-tactile charts for and from blind and visually impaired people. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316782.3316793
  14. The Accessibility of Data Visualizations on the Web for Screen Reader Users: Practices and Experiences During COVID-19. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 16, 1 (March 2023), 4:1–4:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557899
  15. Slide-Tone and Tilt-Tone: 1-DOF Haptic Techniques for Conveying Shape Characteristics of Graphs to Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517790
  16. A. Jonathan R. Godfrey and M. Theodor Loots. 2015. Advice from Blind Teachers on How to Teach Statistics to Blind Students. Journal of Statistics Education 23, 3 (2015). Publisher: American Statistical Association ERIC Number: EJ1083113.
  17. Lucia Hasty. 2017. Teaching Tactile Graphics. http://www.perkinselearning.org/videos/webcast/teaching-tactile-graphics
  18. Guidelines and Standards for Tactile Graphics. Technical Report. Braille Authority of North America. http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/
  19. Infosonics: Accessible Infographics for People who are Blind using Sonification and Voice. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517465
  20. Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049541
  21. Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction 1 (1985), 311–338.
  22. ”Customization is Key”: Four Characteristics of Textual Affordances for Accessible Data Visualization. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.08773 arXiv:2307.08773 [cs].
  23. Neha Kumar and Naveena Karusala. 2021. Braving Citational Justice in Human-Computer Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450389
  24. Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 2 (April 2021), 14:1–14:47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3443686
  25. imMens: Real-time Visual Querying of Big Data. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 3pt4 (June 2013), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12129
  26. Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization Analysis and Design. A K Peters/CRC Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17511
  27. PSST: Enabling Blind or Visually Impaired Developers to Author Sonifications of Streaming Sensor Data. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545700
  28. Reflecting on the Evaluation of Visualization Authoring Systems : Position Paper. In 2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV). 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634297
  29. Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6 (Nov. 2008), 1325–1332. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.125
  30. Hans Rosling. 2006. The best stats you’ve ever seen. https://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen https://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen.
  31. Vega-Lite: A Grammar of Interactive Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599030
  32. Understanding Screen-Reader Users’ Experiences with Online Data Visualizations. In ACM Conference on Computers and Accessibility (SIGACCESS) (ASSETS ’21). New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471202
  33. VoxLens: Making Online Data Visualizations Accessible with an Interactive JavaScript Plug-In. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517431
  34. Ben Shneiderman. 2003. The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. In The Craft of Information Visualization, BENJAMIN B. Bederson and BEN Shneiderman (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-155860915-0/50046-9
  35. Mario Luis Small. 2009. ’How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10, 1 (March 2009), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
  36. Polaris: A System for Query, Analysis, and Visualization of Multidimensional Relational Databases. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8, 1 (2002).
  37. Chart Reader: Accessible Visualization Experiences Designed with Screen Reader Users. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581186
  38. Jakob von Uexküll. 2010. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: with a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  39. ”I am just terrified of my future” Epistemic Violence in Disability Related Technology Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381828
  40. Rich Screen Reader Experiences for Accessible Data Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14519
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.