Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Simultaneous Measurement of Half-Life and Spectral Shape of $^{115}$In $β$-decay with an Indium Iodide Cryogenic Calorimeter (2401.16059v1)

Published 29 Jan 2024 in nucl-ex and nucl-th

Abstract: Current bounds on neutrino Majorana mass are affected by significant uncertainties in the nuclear calculations for neutrinoless double-beta decay. A key issue for a data-driven improvement of the nuclear theory is the actual value of the axial coupling constant $g_A$, which can be investigated through forbidden $\beta$-decays. We present the first measurement of 4${th}$-forbidden $\beta$-decay of ${115}$In with a cryogenic calorimeter based on Indium Iodide. Exploiting the enhanced spectral shape method for the first time to this isotope, our study accurately determines simultaneously spectral shape, $g_A$, and half-life. The Interacting Shell Model, which best fits our data, indicates a half-life for this decay at $T_{1/2}=(5.26\pm0.06) \times 10{14}$,yr.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. S. Abe et al. (KamLAND-Zen), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051801 (2023).
  2. F. Cappuzzello et al. (NUMEN), Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8, 52 (2021a).
  3. F. Cappuzzello et al. (NUMEN), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2130018 (2021b).
  4. I. H. Hashim et al., Phys. Rev. C 108, 014618 (2023).
  5. C. Augier et al. (CUPID-Mo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 162501 (2023).
  6. M. Paulsen et al.,   (2023), arXiv:2309.14014 [nucl-ex] .
  7. A. F. Leder et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 232502 (2022).
  8. H. Behrens and W. Bühring, Electron Radial Wave Functions and Nuclear Beta-Decay (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982).
  9. L. Pagnanini et al. (ACCESS), Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 445 (2023).
  10. O. Azzolini et al. (CUPID), Eur. Phys. J. C78, 428 (2018a).
  11. C. Arnaboldi et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 124703 (2015).
  12. C. Arnaboldi et al., JINST 13, P02026 (2018).
  13. S. Di Domizio et al., JINST 13, P12003 (2018).
  14. E. Gatti and P. F. Manfredi, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 9, 1 (1986).
  15. O. Azzolini et al., Eur. Phys. J. C78, 734 (2018b).
  16. C. Alduino et al., Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016), 10.1103/physrevc.93.045503.
  17. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003).
  18. J. Blachot, Nuclear Data Sheets 113, 2391 (2012).
  19. J. Toivanen and J. Suhonen, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1237 (1998).
  20. F. Iachello and P. v. Isacker, The Interacting Boson-Fermion Model, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
  21. O. Azzolini et al. (CUPID), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 222501 (2023).
  22. D. E. Watt and R. N. Glover, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 7, 105 (1962).
  23. G. B. Beard and W. H. Kelly, Phys. Rev. 122, 1576 (1961).
  24. M. Ramalho and J. Suhonen,   (2023), arXiv:2312.07111 [nucl-th] .
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.