Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Scaling theory of continuous symmetry breaking under advection

Published 3 Jan 2024 in cond-mat.stat-mech and cond-mat.soft | (2401.01603v2)

Abstract: In this work, we discuss how the linear and non-linear advection terms modify the scaling behavior of the continuous symmetry breaking and stabilize the long-range order, even in $d=2$ far from equilibrium, by means of simple scaling arguments. For an example of the liner advection, we consider the $O(n)$ model in the steady shear. Our scaling analysis reveals that the model can undergo the continuous symmetry breaking even in $d=2$ and, moreover, predicts the upper critical dimension $d_{\rm up}=2$. These results are fully consistent with a recent numerical simulation of the $O(2)$ model, where the mean-field critical exponents are observed even in $d=2$. For an example of the non-linear advection, we consider the Toner-Tu hydrodynamic theory, which was introduced to explain polar-ordered flocks, such as the Vicsek model. Our simple scaling argument reproduces the previous results by the dynamical renormalization theory. Furthermore, we discuss the effects of the additional non-linear terms discovered by the recent re-analysis of the hydrodynamic equation. Our scaling argument predicts that the additional non-linear terms modify the scaling exponents and, in particular, recover the isotropic scaling reported in a previous numerical simulation of the Vicsek model. We discuss that the critical exponents predicted by the naive scaling theory become exact in $d=2$ by using a symmetry consideration and similar argument proposed by Toner and Tu.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966).
  2. K. E. Bassler and Z. Rácz, Phys. Rev. E 52, R9 (1995).
  3. H. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. E 108, 064119 (2023a).
  4. H. Ikeda and Y. Kuroda, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14235  (2023).
  5. H. Ikeda, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03155  (2023b).
  6. J. Toner and Y. Tu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4326 (1995).
  7. J. Toner, Phys. Rev. E 86, 031918 (2012).
  8. Y. Minami and H. Nakano, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06390  (2022).
  9. H. Nishimori and G. Ortiz, Elements of phase transitions and critical phenomena (Oxford university press, 2011).
  10. A. Onuki and K. Kawasaki, Annals of Physics 121, 456–528 (1979).
  11. One can include two more non-linear advection terms: (∇⋅𝒗)⁢𝒗⋅∇𝒗𝒗(\nabla\cdot\bm{v})\bm{v}( ∇ ⋅ bold_italic_v ) bold_italic_v and ∇(𝒗⋅𝒗)∇⋅𝒗𝒗\nabla(\bm{v}\cdot\bm{v})∇ ( bold_italic_v ⋅ bold_italic_v ), which has the same scaling dimension as (𝒗⋅∇)⁢𝒗⋅𝒗∇𝒗(\bm{v}\cdot\nabla)\bm{v}( bold_italic_v ⋅ ∇ ) bold_italic_v and do not change the results of the scaling analysis.
  12. D. Nishiguchi, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 92 (2023), 10.7566/jpsj.92.121007.
  13. G. Grégoire and H. Chaté, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 025702 (2004).
  14. P. Sartori and C. F. Lee, New Journal of Physics 21, 073064 (2019).
  15. H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 220601 (2020).
  16. L. Di Carlo and M. Scandolo, New Journal of Physics 24, 123032 (2022).
  17. P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023061 (2023).
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.