Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A universal scheme to self-test any quantum state and extremal measurement

Published 7 Dec 2023 in quant-ph | (2312.04405v2)

Abstract: The emergence of quantum devices has raised a significant issue: how to certify the quantum properties of a device without placing trust in it. To characterise quantum states and measurements in a device-independent way, up to some degree of freedom, we can make use of a technique known as self-testing. While schemes have been proposed to self-test all pure multipartite entangled states (up to complex conjugation) and real local rank-one projective measurements, little has been done to certify mixed entangled states, composite or non-projective measurements. By employing the framework of quantum networks, we propose a scheme for self-testing (up to complex conjugation) arbitrary extremal measurements, including the projective ones, but also in an indirect way any quantum states, including the mixed ones. The quantum network considered in this work is the simple star network, which is implementable using current technologies. For our purposes, we also construct a scheme that can be used to self-test the two-dimensional tomographically complete set of measurements with an arbitrary number of parties.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. J. S. Bell, On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195 (1964).
  2. J. S. Bell, On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).
  3. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus, in Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No. 98CB36280) (IEEE, 1998) pp. 503–509.
  4. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Self testing quantum apparatus, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 273 (2004).
  5. M. McKague, T. H. Yang, and V. Scarani, Robust self-testing of the singlet, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 455304 (2012).
  6. B. Reichardt, F. Unger, and U. Vazirani, Classical command of quantum systems, Nature 496, 456 (2013).
  7. C. Bamps and S. Pironio, Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052111 (2015).
  8. Y. Wang, X. Wu, and V. Scarani, All the self-testings of the singlet for two binary measurements, New J. Phys. 18, 025021 (2016).
  9. A. Coladangelo, K. T. Goh, and V. Scarani, All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested, Nature Communications 8, 15485 (2017).
  10. L. Mančinska, J. Prakash, and C. Schafhauser, Constant-sized robust self-tests for states and measurements of unbounded dimension, arXiv:2103.01729  (2021).
  11. S. Sarkar and R. Augusiak, Self-testing of multipartite greenberger-horne-zeilinger states of arbitrary local dimension with arbitrary number of measurements per party, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032416 (2022).
  12. I. Frérot and A. Acín, Coarse-grained self-testing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 240401 (2021).
  13. R. Chen, J. Volčič, and L. Mančinska, All projective measurements can be self-tested, arXiv:2302.00974  (2023).
  14. M.-O. Renou, J. Kaniewski, and N. Brunner, Self-testing entangled measurements in quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250507 (2018).
  15. I. Šupić and N. Brunner, Self-testing nonlocality without entanglement, arXiv:2203.13171  (2022).
  16. See Supplemental Material.
  17. G. M. D'Ariano, P. L. Presti, and P. Perinotti, Classical randomness in quantum measurements, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38, 5979 (2005).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.