Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Representation of Distribution Grid Expansion Costs in Power System Planning

Published 18 Oct 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY | (2310.11853v1)

Abstract: The shift towards clean energy brings about notable transformations to the energy system. In order to optimally plan a future energy system, it is necessary to consider the influence of several sectors as well as the interaction of the transmission grid and distribution grid. The concept of Feasible Operation Region (FOR) is a detailed approach to representing the operational dependencies between the transmission and distribution grid. However, in previous planning procedures, only a simplified expansion of the distribution grids can be taken into account. With the method presented in this paper, a Feasible Planning Region (FPR) is developed, which represents the operational boundaries of the distribution grids for several expansion stages and thus represents an admissible solution space for the planning of distribution grids in systemic planning approaches. It hence enables a more detailed representation of the necessary distribution grid expansion for the integration of distributed technologies in an optimized energy system of the future. In this paper, we present the method by which the FPR is formed and its integration into an energy system planning formulation. In the results, the FPR is presented for different voltage levels, and its use in power system planning is demonstrated.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. T. Brown, J. Hörsch, and D. Schlachtberger, “PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis,” Journal of Open Research Software, vol. 6, no. 4, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.188
  2. H. Schwaeppe, L. Böttcher, K. Schumann, L. Hein, P. Hälsig, S. Thams, P. B. Lozano, and A. Moser, “Analyzing intersectoral benefits of district heating in an integrated generation and transmission expansion planning model,” Energies, vol. 15, p. 2314, 3 2022.
  3. P. Fortenbacher and T. Demiray, “Reduced and aggregated distribution grid representations approximated by polyhedral sets,” 3 2019.
  4. L. Böttcher, S. Kortmann, J. Saat, H. Schwaeppe, T. Felling, O. Levers, P. Fortenbacher, and A. Ulbig, “Integrating distribution grid characteristics in multi-energy system optimization modeling,” 2023, ”in publication progress”.
  5. J. Hoersch, F. Hofmann, D. Schlachtberger, and T. Brown, “Pypsa-eur: An open optimisation model of the european transmission system,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 22, pp. 207–215, 2018.
  6. U. P. Müller, B. Schachler, M. Scharf, W.-D. Bunke, S. Günther, J. Bartels, and G. Pleßmann, “Integrated techno-economic power system planning of transmission and distribution grids,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 11, 2019.
  7. G. Muñoz-Delgado, J. Contreras, J. M. Arroyo, A. Sanchez de la Nieta, and M. Gibescu, “Integrated transmission and distribution system expansion planning under uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 4113–4125, 2021.
  8. B. Reveron Baecker and S. Candas, “Co-optimizing transmission and active distribution grids to assess demand-side flexibilities of a carbon-neutral german energy system,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 163, p. 112422, 2022.
  9. S. Allard, V. Debusschere, S. Mima, T. T. Quoc, N. Hadjsaid, and P. Criqui, “Considering distribution grids and local flexibilities in the prospective development of the european power system by 2050,” Applied Energy, vol. 270, p. 114958, 2020.
  10. F. Gotzens, H. Heinrichs, J. Hörsch, and F. Hofmann, “Performing energy modelling exercises in a transparent way - The issue of data quality in power plant databases,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 23, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2019.
  11. P. Fortenbacher and T. Demiray, “Reduced and aggregated distribution grid representations approximated by polyhedral sets,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 117, p. 105668, 2020.
  12. L. Böttcher, S. Braun, M. Trageser, K. Schumann, and A. Ulbig, “Investigating systemic extrapolation of distribution grid investment costs,” in 2023 IEEE Belgrade PowerTech, 2023, pp. 1–6.
  13. L. Böttcher, S. Braun, A. Selimaj, A. Chajan, and A. Ulbig, “Method for the assessment of structural parameters for distribution grid cost drivers,” in CIRED 2023 - The 27th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, vol. 2023, 2023, pp. 1–6.
  14. G. Papazoglou and P. Biskas, “Review of Methodologies for the Assessment of Feasible Operating Regions at the TSO–DSO Interface,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 5147, Jan. 2022, number: 14 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5147
  15. L. Lopez, A. Gonzalez-Castellanos, D. Pozo, M. Roozbehani, and M. Dahleh, “Quickflex: a fast algorithm for flexible region construction for the tso-dso coordination,” 2021.
  16. S. Meinecke, D. Sarajlić, S. R. Drauz, A. Klettke, L.-P. Lauven, C. Rehtanz, A. Moser, and M. Braun, “Simbench—a benchmark dataset of electric power systems to compare innovative solutions based on power flow analysis,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 12, 2020.
  17. F. Neumann, E. Zeyen, M. Victoria, and T. Brown, “The potential role of a hydrogen network in europe,” pp. 1–25, 2023.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.