Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Minimum-norm Sparse Perturbations for Opacity in Linear Systems

Published 30 Jun 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY | (2306.17606v2)

Abstract: Opacity is a notion that describes an eavesdropper's inability to estimate a system's 'secret' states by observing the system's outputs. In this paper, we propose algorithms to compute the minimum sparse perturbation to be added to a system to make its initial states opaque. For these perturbations, we consider two sparsity constraints - structured and affine. We develop an algorithm to compute the global minimum-norm perturbation for the structured case. For the affine case, we use the global minimum solution of the structured case as initial point to compute a local minimum. Empirically, this local minimum is very close to the global minimum. We demonstrate our results via a running example.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. B. Ramasubramanian, R. Cleaveland and S. I. Marcus, “Notions of Centralized and Decentralized Opacity in Linear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65(4):1442-1455, 2020.
  2. E. Nekouei, T. Tanaka, M. Skoglund, K. H. Johansson, “Information-theoretic approaches to privacy in estimation and control,” Annual Reviews in Control, 47:412-422, 2019.
  3. E. Nozari, P. Tallapragada and J. Cortés, “Differentially Private Distributed Convex Optimization Via Objective Perturbation,” IEEE American Control Conference, pp. 2061-2066, 2016.
  4. V. M. John and V. Katewa, “Opacity and its Trade-offs with Security in Linear Systems,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 5443-5449, 2022.
  5. S. Lam and E. J. Davison, “A Fast Algorithm to Compute the Controllability, Decentralized Fixed-Mode, and Minimum-phase Radius of LTI Systems,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico, pp. 508-513, 2008.
  6. S. Lam and E. J. Davison, “The Transmission Zero at s Radius and the Minimum Phase Radius of LTI Systems,” IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 41(2):6371-6376, 2008.
  7. G. A. Watson, “The Smallest Perturbation of a Submatrix that Lowers the Rank of the Matrix,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Cancun, Mexico, 8(3):295-303, 1988.
  8. V. M. John and V. Katewa, “Minimum Sparse Perturbation for Opacity in Linear Systems,” arXiv Preprint, arXiv:XX.YY [eess.SY], 2023.
  9. S. C. Johnson, M. Wicks, M. Žefran and R. A. DeCarlo, “The Structured Distance to the Nearest System Without Property 𝒫𝒫\mathcal{P}caligraphic_P,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(9):2960-2975, 2018.
  10. Y. Zhang, Y. Xia and Y. Zhan, “On Real Structured Controllability/Stabilizability/Stability Radius: Complexity and Unified Rank-Relaxation Based Methods,” arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2201.01112 [eess.SY], 2022.
  11. B. Molinari, “Extended Controllability and Observability for Linear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 21(1):136-137, 1976.
  12. H. L. Trentelman, A. A. Stoorvogel and M. Hautus, “Control Theory for Linear Systems,” Springer, ch. 7, 2001.
  13. M. Karow, “Geometry of Spectral Value Sets,” PhD Thesis, University of Bremen, Germany, 2003.
  14. S. Lam, “Real Robustness Radii and Performance Limitations of LTI Control Systems,” PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada, 2011.
  15. S. Lam and E. J. Davison, “The Real DFM Radius and Minimum Norm Plant Perturbation for General Control Information Flow Constraints,” IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 41(2):6365-6370, 2008.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.