Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Framework to Map VMAF with the Probability of Just Noticeable Difference between Video Encoding Recipes (2205.07565v2)

Published 16 May 2022 in eess.IV

Abstract: Just Noticeable Difference (JND) model developed based on Human Vision System (HVS) through subjective studies is valuable for many multimedia use cases. In the streaming industries, it is commonly applied to reach a good balance between compression efficiency and perceptual quality when selecting video encoding recipes. Nevertheless, recent state-of-the-art deep learning based JND prediction model relies on large-scale JND ground truth that is expensive and time consuming to collect. Most of the existing JND datasets contain limited number of contents and are limited to a certain codec (e.g., H264). As a result, JND prediction models that were trained on such datasets are normally not agnostic to the codecs. To this end, in order to decouple encoding recipes and JND estimation, we propose a novel framework to map the difference of objective Video Quality Assessment (VQA) scores, i.e., VMAF, between two given videos encoded with different encoding recipes from the same content to the probability of having just noticeable difference between them. The proposed probability mapping model learns from DCR test data, which is significantly cheaper compared to standard JND subjective test. As we utilize objective VQA metric (e.g., VMAF that trained with contents encoded with different codecs) as proxy to estimate JND, our model is agnostic to codecs and computationally efficient. Throughout extensive experiments, it is demonstrated that the proposed model is able to estimate JND values efficiently.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Jingwen Zhu (16 papers)
  2. Suiyi Ling (16 papers)
  3. Yoann Baveye (1 paper)
  4. Patrick Le Callet (41 papers)
Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.