Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Determining the Hubble Constant without the Sound Horizon: Perspectives with Future Galaxy Surveys (2112.10749v3)

Published 20 Dec 2021 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: $H_0$ constraints from galaxy surveys are sourced by the geometric properties of two standardisable rulers: the sound horizon scale, $r_s$, and the matter-radiation equality scale, $k_{\rm eq}$. While most analyses over the last decade have focused on the first scale, recent work has emphasised that the second can provide an independent source of information about the expansion rate of the universe. Recent approaches to obtain a sound-horizon-independent measurement of $H_0$ from the equality scale have avoided $r_s$-based information by removing the sound-horizon-calibrating prior on the baryon density. We present a new method to marginalise over $r_s$; this allows baryon information to be retained enabling tighter parameter constraints. For a Euclid-like spectroscopic survey, we forecast sound-horizon-independent $H_0$ constraints of $\sigma_{H_0} = 0.7\rm{\ km\ s{-1}\ Mpc{-1}}$ for our method using the equality scale, compared with $\sigma_{H_0} = 0.5\rm{\ km\ s{-1}\ Mpc{-1}}$ from the sound horizon. Upcoming equality scale $H_0$ measurements thus can be highly competitive, although we caution that the impact of observational systematics on such measurements still needs to be investigated in detail. Applying our new approach to the BOSS power spectrum gives $H_0 = 69.5{+3.0}_{-3.5}\rm{\ km\ s{-1}\ Mpc{-1}}$ from equality alone, somewhat tighter than previous constraints. Consistency of $r_s$- and $k_{\rm eq}$-based $H_0$ measurements can provide a valuable internal consistency test of the cosmological model; as an example, we consider the change in $H_0$ created by early dark energy. Assuming the \textit{Planck}+SH0ES best-fit EDE model we find a $2.6\sigma$ shift ($\Delta H_0 = 2.6\rm{\ km\ s{-1}\ Mpc{-1}}$) between the two measurements for Euclid; if we instead assume the ACT best-fit model, this increases to $9.0\sigma$ ($\Delta H_0 = 7.8\rm{\ km\ s{-1}\ Mpc{-1}}$).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube