Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 167 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Galaxy blending effects in deep imaging cosmic shear probes of cosmology (2112.07659v2)

Published 14 Dec 2021 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Upcoming deep imaging surveys such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time will be confronted with challenges that come with increased depth. One of the leading systematic errors in deep surveys is the blending of objects due to higher surface density in the more crowded images; a considerable fraction of the galaxies which we hope to use for cosmology analyses will overlap each other on the observed sky. In order to investigate these challenges, we emulate blending in a mock catalogue consisting of galaxies at a depth equivalent to 1.3 yr of the full 10-yr Rubin Observatory that includes effects due to weak lensing, ground-based seeing, and the uncertainties due to extraction of catalogues from imaging data. The emulated catalogue indicates that approximately 12 per cent of the observed galaxies are ``unrecognized'' blends that contain two or more objects but are detected as one. Using the positions and shears of half a billion distant galaxies, we compute shear--shear correlation functions after selecting tomographic samples in terms of both spectroscopic and photometric redshift bins. We examine the sensitivity of the cosmological parameter estimation to unrecognized blending employing both jackknife and analytical Gaussian covariance estimators. An $\sim0.025$ decrease in the derived structure growth parameter $S_8 = \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3){0.5}$ is seen due to unrecognized blending in both tomographies with a slight additional bias for the photo-$z$-based tomography. This bias is greater than the $2\sigma$ statistical error in measuring $S_8$.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.