Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 61 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 111 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Effects of Forcing on Shocks and Energy Dissipation in Interstellar and Intracluster Turbulences (2111.02109v2)

Published 3 Nov 2021 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Observations indicate that turbulence in the interstellar medium (ISM) is supersonic ($M_{\rm turb}\gg1$) and strongly magnetized ($\beta\sim0.01-1$), while in the intracluster medium (ICM) it is subsonic ($M_{\rm turb}\lesssim1$) and weakly magnetized ($\beta\sim100$). Here, $M_{\rm turb}$ is the turbulent Mach number and $\beta$ is the plasma beta. We study the properties of shocks induced in these disparate environments, including the distribution of the shock Mach number, $M_s$, and the dissipation of the turbulent energy at shocks, through numerical simulations using a high-order accurate code based on the WENO scheme. In particular, we investigate the effects of different modes of the forcing that drives turbulence: solenoidal, compressive, and a mixture of the two. In the ISM turbulence, while the density distribution looks different with different forcings, the velocity power spectrum, $P_v$, on small scales exhibits only weak dependence. Hence, the statistics of shocks depend weakly on forcing either. In the ISM models with $M_{\rm turb}\approx10$ and $\beta\sim0.1$, the fraction of the turbulent energy dissipated at shocks is estimated to be $\sim15~\%$, not sensitive to the forcing mode. In contrast, in the ICM turbulence, $P_v$ as well as the density distribution show strong dependence on forcing. The frequency and average Mach number of shocks are greater for compressive forcing than for solenoidal forcing, so is the energy dissipation. The fraction of ensuing shock dissipation is in the range of $\sim10-35~\%$ in the ICM models with $M_{\rm turb}\approx0.5$ and $\beta\sim106$. The rest of the turbulent energy should be dissipated through turbulent cascade.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube