Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 98 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 58 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 112 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 165 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 29 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Deformed Schwarzschild horizons in second-order perturbation theory: mass, geometry, and teleology (2109.09514v3)

Published 20 Sep 2021 in gr-qc

Abstract: In recent years, gravitational-wave astronomy has motivated increasingly accurate perturbative studies of gravitational dynamics in compact binaries. This in turn has enabled more detailed analyses of the dynamical black holes in these systems. For example, Pound et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021101 (2020)] recently computed the surface area of a Schwarzschild black hole's apparent horizon, perturbed by an orbiting body, to second order in the binary's mass ratio. In this paper, we take that as the starting point for a comprehensive study of a perturbed Schwarzschild black hole's apparent and event horizon at second perturbative order, deriving generic formulas for the first- and second-order corrections to the horizons' radial profiles, surface areas, Hawking masses, and intrinsic curvatures. We find that the two horizons are remarkably similar, and that any teleological behavior of the event horizon is suppressed in several ways. Critically, we establish that at all orders, the perturbed event horizon in a small-mass-ratio binary is effectively localized in time. Even more pointedly, the event horizon is identical to the apparent horizon at linear order regardless of the source of perturbation, implying that the seemingly teleological "tidal lead", previously observed in linearly perturbed event horizons, is not genuinely teleological in origin. The two horizons do generically differ at second order, but their Hawking masses remain identical, implying that the event horizon obeys the same energy-flux balance law as the apparent horizon. At least in the case of a binary system, the difference between their surface areas remains extremely small even in the late stages of inspiral. In the course of our analysis, we also numerically illustrate puzzling behaviour in the black hole's motion around the binary's center of mass.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube