Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
93 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
49 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
24 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
32 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
93 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
75 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
475 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
82 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Insights into searches for anisotropies in the nanohertz gravitational-wave background (2010.13958v2)

Published 26 Oct 2020 in gr-qc and astro-ph.IM

Abstract: Within the next several years pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are positioned to detect the stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) likely produced by the collection of inspiralling super-massive black holes binaries, and potentially constrain some exotic physics. So far most of the pulsar timing data analysis has focused on the monopole of the GWB, assuming it is perfectly isotropic. The natural next step is to search for anisotropies in the GWB. In this paper, we use the recently developed PTA Fisher matrix to gain insights into optimal search strategies for GWB anisotropies. For concreteness, we apply our results to EPTA data, using realistic noise characteristics of its pulsars. We project the detectability of a GWB whose angular dependence is assumed to be a linear combination of predetermined maps, such as spherical harmonics or coarse pixels. We find that the GWB monopole is always statistically correlated with these maps, implying a loss of sensitivity to the monopole when searching simultaneously for anisotropies. We then derive the angular distributions of the GWB intensity to which a PTA is most sensitive, and illustrate how one may use these "principal maps" to approximately reconstruct the angular dependence of the GWB. Since the principal maps are neither perfectly anisotropic nor uncorrelated with the monopole, we also develop a frequentist criterion to specifically search for anisotropies in the GWB without any prior knowledge about their angular distribution. Lastly, we show how to recover existing EPTA results with our Fisher formalism, and clarify their meaning. The tools presented here will be valuable in guiding and optimizing the computationally demanding analyses of pulsar timing data.

Citations (13)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube