Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The galaxy power spectrum from TGSS ADR1 and the effect of flux calibration systematics (1907.10305v2)

Published 24 Jul 2019 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We explore the large to moderate scale anisotropy in distant radio sources using the TGSS ADR1 catalog. We use different measures, i.e. number counts, sky brightness and flux per source, for this study. In agreement with earlier results, we report a significant excess of clustering signal above the angular scale of roughly $10$ degrees (i.e. $l\lessapprox 20-30$). We find that some survey areas have a systematically low/high flux and argue this may be the cause of the observed signal of excess power at low multipoles. With mocks we demonstrate the effect of such large scale flux systematics and recover TGSS like excess clustering signal by assuming $20\%$ flux uncertainties over $\sim 10\circ \times 10\circ$ size patches. We argue that that TGSS at this stage, i.e. TGSS ADR1, is not suitable for large scale clustering measurements. We find that the measure, flux per source, shows evidence of isotropy for all multipoles $l > 2$ despite the presence of systematics in the data.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.