Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
91 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
50 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
27 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
19 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
103 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
82 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
458 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
209 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Comparison of computational methods for the electrochemical stability window of solid-state electrolyte materials (1901.02251v2)

Published 8 Jan 2019 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci and physics.chem-ph

Abstract: Superior stability and safety are key promises attributed to all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) containing solid-state electrolyte (SSE) compared to their conventional counterparts utilizing liquid electrolyte. To unleash the full potential of ASSBs, SSE materials that are stable when in contact with the low and high potential electrodes are required. The electrochemical stability window is conveniently used to assess the SSE-electrode interface stability. In the present work, we review the most important methods to compute the SSE stability window. Our analysis reveals that the stoichiometry stability method represents a bridge between HOMO-LUMO method and phase stability method (grand canonical phase diagram). Moreover, we provide computational implementations of these methods for SSE material screening. We compare their results for the relevant Li- and Na-SSE materials LGPS, LIPON, LLZO, LLTO, LATP, LISICON, and NASICON, and we discuss their relation to published experimental stability windows.

Citations (32)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.