Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 178 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 385 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Softly broken ${\cal N}=2$ SQCD: mass spectra in vacua with unbroken $Z_{2N_c-N_F}$ symmetry (1711.01169v2)

Published 2 Nov 2017 in hep-th

Abstract: Considered are ${\cal N}=2\, SU(N_c)$ or $U(N_c)$ SQCD with $N_F<2N_c-1$ equal mass quark flavors. ${\cal N}=2$ supersymmetry is softly broken down to ${\cal N}=1$ by the mass term $\mu_{\rm x}{\rm Tr}\,(X2)$ of colored adjoint scalar partners of gluons, $\mu_{\rm x}\ll\Lambda_2$ ($\Lambda_2$ is the scale factor of the $SU(N_c)$ gauge coupling). There is a large number of different types of vacua in these theories with both unbroken and spontaneously broken global flavor symmetry, $U(N_F)\rightarrow U({\rm n}1)\times U({\rm n}_2)$. We consider in this paper the large subset of these vacua with the unbroken non-trivial $Z{2N_c-N_F\geq 2}$ discrete symmetry, at different hierarchies between the Lagrangian parameters $m\gtrless\Lambda_2,\,\, \mu_{\rm x}\gtrless m$. The forms of low energy Lagrangians, charges of light particles and mass spectra are described in the main text for all these vacua. The calculations of power corrections to the leading terms of the low energy quark and dyon condensates are presented in two important Appendices. The results agree with also presented in these Appendices independent calculations of these condensates using roots of the Seiberg-Witten spectral curve. This agreement confirms in a non-trivial way a self-consistency of the whole approach. Our results differ essentially from corresponding results in e.g. recent related papers arXiv:1304.0822, arXiv:1403.6086 and arXiv:1704.06201 of M.Shifman and A.Yung (and in a number of their previous numerous papers on this subject), and we explain in the text the reasons for these differences. (See also the extended critique of a number of results of these authors in section 8 of arXiv:1308.5863).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.