Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A search for transit timing variations and orbital decay in WASP-46b (1710.04707v1)

Published 12 Oct 2017 in astro-ph.EP

Abstract: We present 12 new transit observations of the exoplanet WASP-46b obtained with the 1.54-m telescope at Estaci\'on Astrof\'isica de Bosque Alegre (EABA, Argentina) and the 0.40-m Horacio Ghielmetti and 2.15-m Jorge Sahade telescopes at Complejo Astron\'omico El Leoncito (CASLEO, Argentina). We analyse them together with 37 light curves from the literature to re-determine the physical parameters and search for additional planets via transit timing variations (TTVs). We consider the 31 transits with uncertainties in their mid-transit times ($e_\mathrm{T_{0}}$) $<$ 1 minute, to perform the first homogeneous study of TTVs for the system, finding a dispersion of $\sigma= 1.66$ minutes over a 6 year baseline. Since no periodic variations are found, our interpretation for this relatively high value of $\sigma$ is that the stellar activity could be affecting the measured mid-transit times. This value of dispersion allows us to rule out the presence of additional bodies with masses larger than 2.3, 4.6, 7, and 9.3 $M_{\mathrm{\bigoplus}}$ at the first-order mean-motion resonances 2:1, 3:2, 4:3, and 5:4 with the transiting planet, respectively. Despite the 6 year baseline and a typical light curve precision of $2 \times 10{-3}$, we find that we cannot significantly demonstrate a slow decrease of the orbital period of WASP-46b. We place a lower limit of Q${\star}$ > $7 \times 10{3}$ on the tidal quality factor and determine that an additional 6 year baseline is required to rule out Q${\star}$ < $10{5}$.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.