Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks (1707.01836v1)

Published 6 Jul 2017 in cs.CV

Abstract: We develop an algorithm which exceeds the performance of board certified cardiologists in detecting a wide range of heart arrhythmias from electrocardiograms recorded with a single-lead wearable monitor. We build a dataset with more than 500 times the number of unique patients than previously studied corpora. On this dataset, we train a 34-layer convolutional neural network which maps a sequence of ECG samples to a sequence of rhythm classes. Committees of board-certified cardiologists annotate a gold standard test set on which we compare the performance of our model to that of 6 other individual cardiologists. We exceed the average cardiologist performance in both recall (sensitivity) and precision (positive predictive value).

Citations (715)

Summary

  • The paper develops a 34-layer CNN that outperforms board-certified cardiologists in detecting arrhythmias from single-lead ECG records.
  • It leverages an unprecedented dataset of over 29,000 patients and 64,121 ECG records to train and validate its segmentation and classification capabilities.
  • The model achieves high precision (0.800) and recall (0.784), setting new benchmarks for automated arrhythmia diagnosis.

Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract Overview

The paper develops an advanced convolutional neural network (CNN) model that surpasses the performance of board-certified cardiologists in detecting various heart arrhythmias from electrocardiograms (ECG) recorded using a single-lead wearable monitor. This achievement is facilitated by a substantial dataset involving more than 500 times the number of unique patients in comparison to previously studied data. The model, a 34-layer CNN, maps ECG sequences to rhythm class sequences. Performance comparisons against individual cardiologists on a gold-standard test set confirm the model's superior recall and precision.

Introduction

The research introduces a sophisticated model capable of diagnosing irregular heart rhythms from single-lead ECG signals more accurately than cardiologists. Previous estimates indicate 300 million ECGs recorded annually. The challenge in computerized arrhythmia detection stems from the complex relationships in ECG wave types. The model's development entailed creating a vast dataset, significantly larger than those used in earlier studies, from over 30,000 unique patients. The resulting CNN demonstrates proficiency in classifying and segmenting 12 types of arrhythmias.

Model Architecture

The model architecture employs a deep 34-layer CNN, designed for sequence-to-sequence learning, which takes a raw ECG time-series as input and generates rhythm labels as output. Key architectural features include:

  • Shortcut connections: Facilitating the training of very deep networks.
  • Batch normalization and rectified linear activation: Used before convolutional layers.
  • Residual blocks: Incorporating 16 blocks, each with 2 convolutional layers, enhancing the network's depth and context window size for classification decisions.

Training leveraged the Adam optimizer with learning rate adjustments based on validation loss performance.

Dataset Construction

The dataset comprises 64,121 ECG records from 29,163 patients, significantly larger than previous datasets like the MIT-BIH corpus. Data was collected using the Zio Patch monitor, annotating records with rhythm classes ranging from sinus rhythm to noise. This large and balanced dataset ensured robustness in model training and generalization.

Model Evaluation

Evaluation metrics included:

  • Sequence Level Accuracy (F1): Measuring overlap between prediction and ground truth sequence labels.
  • Set Level Accuracy (F1): Focusing on unique arrhythmias in each record, avoiding penalties for time-misalignment.

Performance was benchmarked against annotations from a committee of three cardiologists, comparing recall and precision scores. The model outperformed individual cardiologists across both sequence and set evaluation metrics.

Detailed Results

The model demonstrated superior performance in arrhythmia classification, achieving high precision (0.800) and recall (0.784) scores. Notably, the model excelled in detecting critical arrhythmias such as AV Block types and complete heart block, which are crucial for immediate clinical intervention. These improvements, verified through robust metrics, reflect the model's capability to discern subtle but vital differences in ECG patterns.

Analysis and Implications

The confusion matrix analysis revealed understandable mistakes, often involving similarly presenting arrhythmias. The model's ability to outperform cardiologists highlights its potential integration into clinical workflows, providing a rapid, reliable second opinion and reducing diagnostic errors. This advancement could notably shift the diagnostic landscape, increasing the efficiency and accuracy of arrhythmia diagnoses.

Future Developments

Future research should aim to expand the arrhythmia classifications and explore multi-lead ECG data applications, broadening the scope of detectable heart conditions. The model's deployment could democratize access to high-quality cardiac care, particularly in regions with a paucity of expert cardiologists. Continued advancements in model accuracy and scope could further enhance its clinical utility.

Conclusion

The convolutional neural network developed in this research sets a new standard in automated arrhythmia detection, showcasing enhanced performance relative to board-certified cardiologists. The model's success hinges on a large annotated dataset and an advanced deep learning architecture, positioning it as a powerful tool in clinical diagnostics. Future work should aim to expand the range of detectable cardiac conditions and further validate the model's clinical impact.

For reference, please consult the detailed metrics and additional rhythm class descriptions provided in the full paper.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.