Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 75 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 226 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Gravitational Horizon for a Universe with Phantom Energy (1206.6192v2)

Published 27 Jun 2012 in astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.HE, gr-qc, and hep-ph

Abstract: The Universe has a gravitational horizon, coincident with the Hubble sphere, that plays an important role in how we interpret the cosmological data. Recently, however, its significance as a true horizon has been called into question, even for cosmologies with an equation-of-state w = p/rho > -1, where p and rho are the total pressure and energy density, respectively. The claim behind this argument is that its radius R_h does not constitute a limit to our observability when the Universe contains phantom energy, i.e., when w < -1, as if somehow that mitigates the relevance of R_h to the observations when w > -1. In this paper, we reaffirm the role of R_h as the limit to how far we can see sources in the cosmos, regardless of the Universe's equation of state, and point out that claims to the contrary are simply based on an improper interpretation of the null geodesics.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)