Interpreting Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities (1004.2531v1)

Abstract: We elaborate an interpretation of quantum physics founded on the hypothesis that quantum particles are conceptual entities playing the role of communication vehicles between material entities composed of ordinary matter which function as memory structures for these quantum particles. We show in which way this new interpretation gives rise to a natural explanation for the quantum effects of interference and entanglement by analyzing how interference and entanglement emerge for the case of human concepts. We put forward a scheme to derive a metric based on similarity as a predecessor for the structure of 'space, time, momentum, energy' and 'quantum particles interacting with ordinary matter' underlying standard quantum physics, within the new interpretation, and making use of aspects of traditional quantum axiomatics. More specifically, we analyze how the effect of non-locality arises as a consequence of the confrontation of such an emerging metric type of structure and the remaining presence of the basic conceptual structure on the fundamental level, with the potential of being revealed in specific situations.

Interpreting Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities

Diederik Aerts introduces an innovative interpretation of quantum mechanics in the paper titled "Interpreting Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities." This interpretation is founded on the hypothesis that quantum particles function as conceptual entities facilitating communication between material entities, which serve as memory structures for these particles. Aerts proposes that quantum phenomena such as interference and entanglement can be naturally explained through this conceptual lens by drawing parallels with human concept interference.

Conceptual Framework

Aerts draws upon his earlier work in modeling cognitive processes with quantum mechanical formalism, suggesting that quantum entities exhibit behaviors analogous to human concepts. This approach marks a departure from traditional interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, and posits that quantum entities should not be viewed as physical objects but rather as conceptual agents within a vast communicative framework.

Interference and Entanglement

A key aspect of this interpretation is the explanation of quantum interference, observed in phenomena like the double-slit experiment. Aerts parallels the interference of quantum particles with that of human concepts, suggesting that concepts, when overlapping, exhibit interference patterns akin to quantum particles. This perspective provides insights into the nature of quantum state superposition and its collapse upon measurement.

Entanglement, a cornerstone of quantum theory and a basis for phenomena such as non-local correlations, is reframed in this model as a natural outcome of the interaction of conceptual entities. Aerts posits that entanglement results from the intrinsic linked nature of these entities, akin to intertwined concepts in human cognition.

Non-Locality and Conceptual Structures

The paper further explores the concept of non-locality, elucidating how quantum axiomatics trace non-local behaviors to similarity-based structures. This interpretation intimates that the spatial configuration familiar in classical physics may emerge from an underlying conceptual metric, entwining space and quantum entities in a web of possibilities dictated by conceptual resemblance rather than mere proximity.

Implications for Quantum Theory

Aerts' conceptual framework challenges the traditional boundaries between quantum mechanics and epistemology, suggesting that quantum particles are vehicles for conceptual interaction rather than isolated physical phenomena. This view could lead to a reevaluation of space, time, and matter as emergent properties of a more fundamental conceptual structure.

Future Directions

The theoretical implications of interpreting quantum particles as conceptual entities pave the way for novel lines of inquiry in quantum theory and provide a unified approach that bridges cognitive science and quantum physics. Future research could focus on developing formal axiomatics for conceptual quantum mechanics, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of the micro and macro worlds.

In conclusion, Aerts presents a compelling argument for reinterpreting quantum particles through the lens of conceptual entities, providing a transformative paradigm that merges quantum mechanics with human cognition. This approach offers profound insights into longstanding quantum phenomena and opens avenues for innovative theoretical and applied research in the foundational physics of quantum mechanics.