Validate the sensitivity of heuristic machine-side trust parameters
Characterize the sensitivity of the CRiDiT machine-side trustworthiness estimate to variations in its heuristic base masses, severity-scaling formula, and fixed context weight, and determine whether these choices materially affect reported calibration states.
References
The base masses, severity scaling formula, and context weight are heuristic choices made to produce plausible trust dynamics during piloting. They were not derived from empirical data nor independently validated; their sensitivity to variation is not characterised in this study and constitutes an open question for the next design cycle.
Two operator choices remain open and are testable against the interaction logs without new data: whether DST with PCR5 is more sensitive than linear weighted-sum aggregation under conflicting evidence, and whether prioritising behavioural over subjective inputs yields a more stable $\mathcal{H}_t$ than equal weighting.