Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Unclear rationale for restricting analysis to a filtered subset and consistency of exclusion criteria across universities

Determine the rationale for restricting the analysis to the filtered subset of staff cohorts and establish whether exclusionary criteria (e.g., salary point thresholds) have consistent meaning across different Russell Group universities, especially given that all staff were subject to the national Default Retirement Age prior to 2011.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The Data Report indicates that the filtered dataset covers a subset of staff cohorts, yet before 2011 all staff in Cambridge and the RRG were subject to the national Default Retirement Age. The authors question both the rationale for restricting attention to a subset and whether salary point and contractual criteria are comparable across institutions, which affects the validity of cross-university comparisons.

References

In fact, before 2011 everyone in Cambridge and RRG were subject to the national Default Retirement Age and so it is not so clear why attention is restricted to such a subset of the work force, and whether the exclusionary criteria have the same meaning at different universities.

Is the EJRA proportionate and therefore justified? A critical review of the EJRA policy at Cambridge (2405.14611 - Linton et al., 23 May 2024) in Section 3.1, Effect of EJRA on Job Creation Rate (Quantitative assessment of the Data Report)