Tightness of the 16·rational-degree^4 upper bound on decision-tree complexity

Determine whether there exists a Boolean function f for which the upper bound D(f) ≤ 16·rdeg(f)^4 is tight, by identifying an explicit function that achieves equality up to constant factors or proving that such a function does not exist.

Background

The authors show D(f) ≤ 2·ndeg(f)2·ndeg(¬f)2 ≤ 2·rdeg(f)4 and D(f) ≤ 4·sdeg(f)2·rdeg(f)2 ≤ 16·rdeg(f)4. They note that the 2·rdeg(f)4 bound is tight for two-bit parity.

However, they explicitly state that they do not know any function for which the 16·rdeg(f)4 bound is tight, leaving open the question of its tightness.

References

There is also an interesting sense in which $D(f) \leq 2\rdeg(f)4$ is stronger than $D(f) \leq 16\rdeg(f)4$: the former inequality is tight for the two-bit parity function, but we do not know of any function for which the latter is tight.

Rational degree is polynomially related to degree  (2601.08727 - Kovacs-Deak et al., 13 Jan 2026) in Section 3 (Remark, following Corollary 3.10)