Location of the first failing exponent

Determine whether p₀=4, where p₀=inf{p>2:e(ℓₚⁿ)>n+1 for some n}, equivalently determine whether Kusner’s conjecture begins to fail immediately above the range 2≤p≤4.

Background

The paper proves that the n+1 bound holds for every 2≤p≤4, while its certified construction at p=5 and its continuation argument imply that failure occurs for some exponents below 5. Consequently, the threshold p₀ at which a violation first appears lies in [4,5).

The unresolved question is whether the lower endpoint is sharp: if p₀=4, then violations would occur arbitrarily close to 4 from above, despite the established validity throughout the closed interval [2,4].

References

With $p_0=\inf{p>2:e(\ell_pn)>n+1\text{ for some }n}\in[4,5)$ as in Corollary~\ref{cor:interval}, is $p_0=4$? That is, does the conjecture begin to fail immediately above the range $2\le p\le4$?

A counterexample to Kusner's conjecture on equilateral sets  (2608.14013 - Chalmers, 14 Aug 2026) in Problem 2, Section 5 (Concluding remarks)