Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Classify survival probability in the borderline law-of-iterated-logarithm regime

Determine whether the survival probability P(τ < ∞) equals 1 or is strictly less than 1 for the first passage time τ of the geometric Brownian motion V_t = V_0 exp((μ − σ^2/2) t + σ W_t) through a continuous positive barrier B(t) with B(0) = K < V_0, under the simultaneous conditions: (i) limsup_{t→∞} B(t) / [K exp((μ − σ^2/2) t − σ sqrt(2 t ln ln t))] ≥ 1, (ii) liminf_{t→∞} B(t) / [K exp((μ − σ^2/2) t − σ sqrt(2 t ln ln t))] < 1, and (iii) limsup_{t→∞} B(t) / [K exp((μ − σ^2/2) t + σ sqrt(2 t ln ln t))] ≤ 1, in order to resolve the classification between P(τ < ∞) = 1 and 0 < P(τ < ∞) < 1.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper studies first passage times of geometric Brownian motion through general continuous barriers and classifies default risk into regimes based on whether the first passage time is almost surely finite and whether its mean is finite. Using the law of the iterated logarithm, the authors establish criteria guaranteeing P(τ < ∞) = 1 and criteria ensuring 0 < P(τ < ∞) < 1.

However, when the barrier’s long-time behavior oscillates near the critical law-of-iterated-logarithm envelopes, the established results do not decide whether survival to infinity has positive probability or is null. Specifically, if the barrier’s limsup relative to the lower LIL envelope is at least one, its liminf is below one, and its limsup relative to the upper LIL envelope is at most one, the current theorems do not determine whether P(τ < ∞) equals 1 or lies strictly between 0 and 1. The authors explicitly note this undecidability and call for additional conditions to complete the classification.

References

we cannot deduce if 0 < \mathbb{P}(\tau < \infty) < 1 or \mathbb{P}(\tau < \infty) = 1 (we only know that 0 < \mathbb{P}(\tau < \infty) \le 1). Thus, more conditions must be added to ascertain the correct classification in these cases (see Section~\ref{sec:examples}).

Three-level qualitative classification of financial risks under varying conditions through first passage times (2507.08101 - Bouthelier-Madre et al., 10 Jul 2025) in Remark rem:undecidable_cases, Section The even finer structure of criticality