Predictive mapping from training procedures to cognitive capabilities
Determine predictive relationships between specific large language model training procedures (e.g., supervised fine-tuning, process supervision, reinforcement learning) and the emergence of particular reasoning capabilities (e.g., meta-cognitive monitoring, representational restructuring) so that one can know a priori which training produces which cognitive capabilities.
References
Overall, our analyses expose fundamental gaps: we cannot know which training produces which cognitive capabilities a priori, cannot ensure behaviors transfer beyond training distributions, and cannot validate whether observed patterns reflect genuine cognitive mechanisms or spurious reasoning shortcuts.
Stage~2 helps on the reasoning-essential task and is neutral on the knowledge-heavy one; we do not yet know how to predict its benefit without running it.
The convergence of these studies across different methods and systems implies that there is, in fact, value in having foundational spatial awareness, but they do not prove that a strict training order is required.