Maturity of QC/QM/MM embedding methodology
Resolve the active-space, embedding-boundary, polarisation, coupling, convergence, measurement-overhead, and resource-estimation issues required for quantum-computing/quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QC/QM/MM) calculations to become a mature methodology.
References
Several issues nonetheless remain unresolved before QC/QM/MM can be considered a mature methodology: the principles for selection of the active space and of its boundary with the surrounding QM/MM region; errors introduced at that embedding boundary, including truncation and basis-set artefacts; treatment of polarisation and electrostatic response between the quantum algorithm, HPC QM, and HPC MM layers; the scheme used to couple the quantum and classical layers, and its convergence; the measurement overhead required to extract energies, gradients, or properties from the quantum layer at each optimisation or dynamics step; and resource estimation for hybrid HPC-QC calculations, including scaling of the individual component calculations.
The dependence of $E\text{A-B}_\text{nad}$ on the relaxed density $\gamma\text{A}_\text{emb}$ is generally unknown.