Maturity of QC/QM/MM embedding methodology
Resolve the active-space, embedding-boundary, polarisation, coupling, convergence, measurement-overhead, and resource-estimation issues required for quantum-computing/quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QC/QM/MM) calculations to become a mature methodology.
References
These studies collectively suggest that combining quantum-derived active-space wave functions with classical correlation treatments provides a promising route toward chemically accurate simulations. However, previous demonstrations have been restricted primarily to relatively small molecular systems, leaving its applicability to realistic catalytic problems unresolved.
Several issues nonetheless remain unresolved before QC/QM/MM can be considered a mature methodology: the principles for selection of the active space and of its boundary with the surrounding QM/MM region; errors introduced at that embedding boundary, including truncation and basis-set artefacts; treatment of polarisation and electrostatic response between the quantum algorithm, HPC QM, and HPC MM layers; the scheme used to couple the quantum and classical layers, and its convergence; the measurement overhead required to extract energies, gradients, or properties from the quantum layer at each optimisation or dynamics step; and resource estimation for hybrid HPC-QC calculations, including scaling of the individual component calculations.
The dependence of $E\text{A-B}_\text{nad}$ on the relaxed density $\gamma\text{A}_\text{emb}$ is generally unknown.