Interpretability of self-supervised audio embeddings for clinical speech analysis

Determine which aspects of speech signals are captured by self-supervised audio embeddings and how those aspects relate to underlying clinical constructs, in order to establish their clinical interpretability and suitability for health applications.

Background

The paper discusses self-supervised learning and foundational models as sources of powerful audio embeddings for voice and speech analysis. Although these representations can encode salient acoustic information, they do not provide direct physiological or clinical interpretations. The authors note that embeddings may also capture confounding information, including recording-channel characteristics, language content, and sociodemographic biases, which can undermine their reliability in clinical applications.

The unresolved issue is therefore to identify the signal properties represented by these embeddings and to establish how those properties map onto clinically meaningful constructs. Resolving this issue would support the responsible use of embeddings alongside interpretable acoustic baselines and help determine whether their predictive performance reflects clinically relevant information rather than spurious correlations.

References

While recent advances in self-supervised learning and foundational models have produced powerful audio embeddings (i. vectors that capture salient acoustic information but are not directly explainable), these representations lack direct physiological or clinical interpretability, making it unclear which aspects of the signal they capture and how these relate to underlying clinical constructs.

— Towards clinical adoption of voice and speech as measures of health: the need for harmonization  (2609.28894 - Cummins et al., 24 Sep 2026) in Section 1, subsection “Spotlight on feature extraction”