General scaling law for noise thresholds in deterministic analog combinatorial optimization solvers
Establish whether the noise-tolerance thresholds observed in deterministic analog combinatorial optimization solvers universally obey scaling laws similar to those found in the chaotic amplitude control Ising solver and the analog k-SAT solver; specifically, determine if the hard noise-thresholds for solution-finding capability exhibit an approximate polynomial (algebraic) dependence on the problem size N across diverse solver architectures, problem classes, and noise models.
References
More generally, we conjecture that similar scaling laws hold in general for deterministic analog combinatorial optimization solvers, as we will demonstrate below for an analog $k$-SAT solver.
Other questions are open: whether a ternary step of SUBLEQ can have depth below $11$, since Lemma~\ref{lem:muxdepth} and Remark~\ref{rem:ternarydepth} bound only a read and the branch; how few records a self-reproducing stored network needs; and how much noise a reproducing run tolerates when the perturbations are correlated or drift, which the independence assumed in Section~\ref{sec:robust} excludes.