Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open questions on using generative AI for content quality measurement with human involvement

Determine effective methodologies for deploying generative AI to scale measurement of content quality and policy-violation labeling, and ascertain whether and how human involvement should be maintained in individual content moderation decisions.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Section 9.1 argues that generative AI could provide cheaper and faster quality measurement, potentially enabling more comprehensive monitoring that traditionally required human labeling. Despite this potential, the authors explicitly flag significant open questions about implementation details.

A central unresolved issue is the appropriate role of human reviewers when generative AI is incorporated into content moderation workflows, particularly at the level of individual moderation decisions.

References

Though participants agreed on the potential impact of Gen AI in this area, there were significant open questions on how this could be done, such as the need to keep human involvement in individual content moderation decisions.

What We Know About Using Non-Engagement Signals in Content Ranking (2402.06831 - Cunningham et al., 9 Feb 2024) in Section 9.1 (Generative AI may help scale quality measures)