Beyond square-root regret guarantees for FTPL

Establish whether Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader algorithms for adversarial linear bandits can achieve first-order, second-order, or best-of-both-worlds regret guarantees.

Background

The presented FTPL method provides a worst-case square-root regret guarantee, but the explicit spanner exploration used by the algorithm incurs an exploration cost that is itself of square-root order in the horizon. The paper leaves unresolved whether FTPL can attain stronger adaptive guarantees, including first-order, second-order, or best-of-both-worlds regret bounds.

References

Second, it remains open whether FTPL can achieve first-order, second-order \citep{rakhlin2013online,bubeck2019improved, ito2020tight}, or best-of-both-worlds regret \citep{kong2023best, ito2023best, dann2023blackbox}.

— Follow the Perturbed Leader for Linear Bandits: $\sqrt{T}$ Regret over General Convex Sets  (2610.17818 - Wei, 13 Oct 2026) in Section Open Problems

Third, it remains unclear how to achieve high-probability regret or corruption robustness with FTPL.

— Follow the Perturbed Leader for Linear Bandits: $\sqrt{T}$ Regret over General Convex Sets  (2610.17818 - Wei, 13 Oct 2026) in Section Open Problems