Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Minimax simple‑regret rate in noisy convex zeroth‑order optimisation

Determine the minimax rate, as a function of the dimension d and the query budget n, of the simple regret f(\hat x) − min_{x \in \bar{\mathcal X}} f(x) for the sequential adaptive noisy zeroth‑order optimisation problem defined as follows: a learner selects points x_t \in \bar{\mathcal X} (a bounded convex subset of \mathbb{R}^d) and observes y_t \in [0,1] with \mathbb{E}[y_t | x_t] = f(x_t), where f: \bar{\mathcal X} \to [0,1] is convex and observations are conditionally independent; after n queries the learner outputs \hat x. The task is to establish the optimal (minimax) dependence on d and n for the achievable simple regret in this setting without imposing strong convexity or smoothness assumptions.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper studies noisy convex zeroth‑order optimisation over a bounded convex domain with sequential, adaptive queries. Performance is measured by the simple regret f(\hat x) − inf_{x \in \bar{\mathcal X}} f(x). The authors present a conceptually simple algorithm inspired by the center‑of‑gravity method and prove a high‑probability regret bound of order d2 / \sqrt{n} up to polylogarithmic factors, under a mild assumption that the minimiser is not too close to the boundary.

Existing results for related settings include upper bounds translating to roughly d{2.5}/\sqrt{n} in this simple‑regret setting (from adversarial cumulative‑regret analyses) and lower bounds of order d/\sqrt{n} for linear functions, leaving a gap. The authors explicitly note that, despite their improvement, the precise minimax rate for this problem remains unknown.

References

Yet does not answer the open question on what is the minimax rate in this setting

A simple and improved algorithm for noisy, convex, zeroth-order optimisation (2406.18672 - Carpentier, 26 Jun 2024) in Section 1 (Introduction), footnote following the sentence “This slightly improves over the best known bound for this problem”