Evaluate proportional responses to focus-monitoring flags
Determine whether replacing irreversible video restarts with dismissible pauses, while reserving restarts for repeated or identity-level anomalies and recording dismissals for instructor review, reduces learner friction without undermining the attention-enforcement function of ViBe’s focus-monitoring system.
References
A dismissible pause answers that objection only if dismissals are themselves recorded and surfaced to the instructor, so that the mechanism documents a suspected lapse instead of punishing it, with the restart reserved for repeated or identity-level anomalies. This is a design conjecture rather than a tested result. The study identifies where the friction arises but does not test whether this change would reduce it.
That proportionality marks the tipping point this paper has moved towards without yet locating: the boundary at which an attention guardrail becomes a barrier to learning.
Future work will scale the two-track instrument and map its responses against the mandatory end-of-course survey. We will compare camera and voice logs across learner groups, with independent verification, to test whether flag frequency predicts departure, and investigate whether focus-monitoring itself aids persistence and whether reported friction stems from learner misunderstanding.