Elementary translation of cut proofs between epsilon calculus and first-order sequent calculi
Determine whether sequent-calculus derivations with cuts formulated in the epsilon calculus (the epsilon-format sequent calculus defined in Section 3, where strong quantifier inferences are replaced by substitutions using epsilon terms) can be translated into derivations with cuts in a standard first-order sequent calculus with only an elementary increase in proof size (i.e., bounded by an elementary function of the original derivation length).
References
The question remains however, whether $$-derivations with cuts can be translated into $$-derivations with cuts in an elementary way.
— Epsilon Calculus Provides Shorter Cut-Free Proofs
(2401.09183 - Baaz et al., 2024) in End of Section 3: "$$, $$, and Related Sequent Calculi"