Strengthening the AKE_≡ result to pointed equivalence for e>0
Establish whether, for any prime p and imperfection degree e>0, and any pointed valued fields (K,v,t) and (L,w,s) in the class C_{p,e}, the biconditional holds: ((vK,v(t)) ≡ (wL,w(s)) and O_v/(t) ≡ O_w/(s)) if and only if (K,v,t) ≡ (L,w,s).
References
Whether this works in greater generality remains open: Can \Cref{thm:ake-equiv} be strengthened to an equivalence in general? More precisely: Given $p$ prime and $e \in \mathbb{N} \cup {\infty}$, $e>0$, and two pointed valued fields $(K,v,t)$ and $(L,w,t)$ in $\mathcal{C}_{p,e}$. Does the equivalence $$((vK,v(t))\equiv (wL,w(s)) \textrm{ and } O_v/(t) \equiv O_w/(s)) \Longleftrightarrow (K,v,t) \equiv (L,w,s)$$ hold?
— AKE principles for deeply ramified fields
(2603.29528 - Jahnke et al., 31 Mar 2026) in Subsection “Elementary equivalence”, after Theorem thm:ake-equiv