Determine whether discrepant component ages are genuine

Determine whether the seven M51 eclipsing-binary systems identified as formally discrepant in component age are genuinely age-discrepant, rather than appearing discrepant because the inferred ages depend strongly on the adopted stellar-evolution models, using independent spectroscopic and dynamical-mass constraints where necessary.

Background

The paper fits temperatures, radii, and surface gravities for both components of 136 M51 eclipsing-binary candidates and compares them with solar-metallicity MIST stellar-evolution tracks to infer apparent component ages. Most systems are consistent with coevality, but seven systems are discrepant at the formal 95% level.

The authors caution that these apparent age differences may result from model dependence or binary-interaction processes such as mass transfer, tidal distortion, rotational mixing, contact evolution, or mergers. They state that independent spectroscopy and dynamical masses are needed to measure surface gravities more precisely and establish whether the discrepancies are statistically real.

References

Whether these systems are truly age-discrepant remains unclear, given that the inferred ages are highly model-dependent. Independent spectroscopy and dynamical masses would be required to calculate their $\log g$ more precisely and determine whether they are statistically discrepant.

— A census of massive eclipsing binaries in the Whirlpool Galaxy  (2609.19268 - Shariat et al., 16 Sep 2026) in Section 4.3, subsection “Evolutionary state and coevality” (paragraph discussing Figure 8)