Develop a criterion for useful enlargement of the test-function family

Identify a criterion that determines in advance when enlarging the family of Barankin test functions—for example, by adding site-potential or other residence-time perturbations—will improve the finite-perturbation variance bound for a nonlinear observable.

Background

The paper enlarges the perturbation family beyond edge-rate tilts by adding site potentials, which substantially improves the bound for the three-state motor but provides almost no improvement in the independent two-channel model. The authors investigate whether the coupling of candidate directions to the observable provides a cheap diagnostic, but this diagnostic fails: stronger coupling does not reliably predict a larger gain.

Consequently, the paper does not provide an a priori method for deciding whether additional test functions will contribute new useful span to the Barankin projection. Establishing such a criterion would reduce the need to enlarge candidate families empirically and measure the resulting bound.

References

We also have no criterion for when enlarging the family of test functions will help: Section~\ref{sec:limits} records a plausible diagnostic that turns out to point the wrong way.

— Blind directions of linear response and the limits of finite-perturbation bounds on efficiency fluctuations  (2609.37940 - Farih, 29 Sep 2026) in Section ‘Discussion’, subsection ‘What is bounded’