Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Infeasibility of degree-4 Steiner points in optimal BCST for α in (0.5, 1) on the plane

Prove or disprove that, in the branched central spanning tree (BCST) problem with terminals embedded in the Euclidean plane and parameter α in the open interval (0.5, 1), every optimal solution uses Steiner points of degree at most three unless a Steiner point coincides with a terminal (i.e., establish the infeasibility of degree-4 Steiner points under these conditions).

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper proves that degree-4 Steiner points cannot occur in optimal BCST solutions on the Euclidean plane when α ∈ [0, 0.5] or α = 1, unless they collapse with a terminal. For the intermediate regime α ∈ (0.5, 1), the authors provide empirical evidence but no analytical proof.

Resolving this would close the theoretical gap for the entire range α ∈ [0,1] and align the structural characterization of optimal solutions with the established results for the endpoint cases.

References

Though we have not been able to prove analytically the infeasibility of degree-4 BPs for $\alpha \in ]0.5,1[$, we strongly believe that the statement still holds.

The Central Spanning Tree Problem (2404.06447 - Sanmartín et al., 9 Apr 2024) in Section "Geometry of Optimal BCST Topologies", Subsection "Infeasibility of Degree-4 Steiner Points in the Plane"