Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 177 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Random Linear Systems with Quadratic Constraints: from Random Matrix Theory to replicas and back (2401.03209v2)

Published 6 Jan 2024 in cond-mat.stat-mech, math-ph, and math.MP

Abstract: I present here a pedagogical introduction to the works by Rashel Tublin and Yan V. Fyodorov on random linear systems with quadratic constraints, using tools from Random Matrix Theory and replicas. These notes illustrate and complement the material presented at the Summer School organised within the Puglia Summer Trimester 2023 in Bari (Italy). Consider a system of $M$ linear equations in $N$ unknowns, $\sum_{j=1}N A_{kj}x_j=b_k$ for $k=1,\ldots,M$, subject to the constraint that the solutions live on the $N$-sphere, $x_12+\ldots + x_N2=N$. Assume that both the coefficients $A_{ij}$ and the parameters $b_i$ be independent Gaussian random variables with zero mean. Using two different approaches -- based on Random Matrix Theory and on a replica calculation -- it is possible to compute whether a large linear system subject to a quadratic constraint is typically solvable or not, as a function of the ratio $\alpha=M/N$ and the variance $\sigma2$ of the $b_i$'s. This is done by defining a quadratic loss function $H({\bf x})=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}M\left[\sum_{j=1}NA_{kj} x_j-b_k\right]2$ and computing the statistics of its minimal value on the sphere, $E_{min}=\min_{||\bf x||2=N}H({\bf x})$, which is zero if the system is compatible, and larger than zero if it is incompatible. One finds that there exists a compatibility threshold $0<\alpha_c<1$, such that systems with $\alpha>\alpha_c$ are typically incompatible. This means that even weakly under-complete linear systems could become typically incompatible if forced to additionally obey a quadratic constraint.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Y. V. Fyodorov and R. Tublin. Optimization landscape in the simplest constrained random least-square problem. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 244008 (2022).
  2. Y. V. Fyodorov and R. Tublin. Counting stationary points of the loss function in the simplest constrained least-square optimization. Acta Phys. Pol. B 51, 1663 – 1672 (2020).
  3. R. Tublin. A Few Results in Random Matrix Theory and Random Optimization. Ph.D. thesis at King’s College London (2022), online at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/182845766/2022˙Tublin˙Rashel˙1210445˙ethesis.pdf.
  4. C. Spearman. General intelligence objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology 15 (2), 201–293 (1904).
  5. L. Thurstone. Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review 38 (5), 406–427 (1931).
  6. L. Thurstone. The Vectors of Mind. Psychological Review 41, 1–32 (1934).
  7. C. Simon, https://simonensemble.github.io/posts/2018-10-27-orthogonal-procrustes/ (2018).
  8. M. W. Browne. On Oblique Procrustes Rotation. Psychometrica 32 (2), 125–132 (1967).
  9. W. Gander. Least Squares with a Quadratic Constraint. Numer. Math. 36, 291-307 (1981).
  10. G. H. Golub and U. von Matt. Quadratically constrained least squares and quadratic problems. Numerische Mathematik 59 (1), 561–-580 (1991).
  11. R. A. Janik and M. A. Nowak. Wishart and anti-Wishart random matrices. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36(12), 3629 (2003).
  12. Y.-K. Yu and Y.-C. Zhang. On the Anti-Wishart distribution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 312(1–2), 1-22 (2002).
  13. V. A. Marčenko and L. A. Pastur. Distribution of eigenvalues in certain ensembles of random matrices. Mat. Sb. 72, 507–536 (1967).
  14. Y. V. Fyodorov and P. Le Doussal. Topology Trivialization and Large Deviations for the Minimum in the Simplest Random Optimization. J. Stat Phys. 154(1-2), 466-490 (2014).
  15. T. Castellani and A. Cavagna. Spin-glass theory for pedestrians. J. Stat. Mech. 2005 (05), P05012 (2005).
  16. F. Zamponi. Mean field theory of spin glasses. Preprint arXiv: 1008.4844 (2010).
  17. A. Bovier. Statistical Mechanics of Disordered Systems: A Mathematical Perspective. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
  18. D. Panchenko. The Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model. (Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 2013).
  19. Y. V. Fyodorov. A spin glass model for reconstructing nonlinearly encrypted signals corrupted by noise. J Stat. Phys. 175(5), 789–818 (2019).
  20. Y. V. Fyodorov. Negative Moments of Characteristic Polynomials of Random Matrices: Ingham-Siegel Integral as an alternative to Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation. Nucl. Phys. B [PM] 621, 643–674 (2002).
  21. Y. V. Fyodorov. Multifractality and Freezing Phenomena in Random Energy Landscapes: an Introduction. Physica A: Stat. Theor. Phys. 389 (20), 4229-4254 (2010).
  22. G. Parisi. The order parameter for spin glasses: a function on the interval 0−1010-10 - 1. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13, 1101–1112 (1980).
  23. H. Touchette. The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics. Physics Reports 478(1–3), 1-69 (2009).
  24. A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni. Matrix Optimization Under Random External Fields. J. Stat. Phys. 159 (6), 1306–-1326 (2015).
  25. P. Kivimae. Critical fluctuations for the spherical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model in an external field. Preprint arXiv: 1908.07512v2 (2020).
  26. B. Landon and P. Sosoe. Fluctuations of the 2-spin SSK model with magnetic field. Preprint arXiv: 2009.12514v2 (2022).
  27. P. Urbani. A continuous constraint satisfaction problem for the rigidity transition in confluent tissues. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 115003 (2023).
  28. S. Akhanjee and J. Rudnick. Spherical Spin-Glass–Coulomb-Gas Duality: Solution beyond Mean-Field Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 047206 (2010).
  29. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
  30. G. Livan and P. Vivo. Moments of Wishart-Laguerre and Jacobi ensembles of random matrices: application to the quantum transport problem in chaotic cavities. Acta Physica Polonica B 42, 1081 (2011).
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 14 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: