Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Beyond Frameworks: Unpacking Collaboration Strategies in Multi-Agent Systems (2505.12467v1)

Published 18 May 2025 in cs.MA and cs.AI

Abstract: Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for addressing complex, distributed tasks in LLM-driven applications. While prior research has focused on high-level architectural frameworks, the granular mechanisms governing agents, critical to performance and scalability, remain underexplored. This study systematically investigates four dimensions of collaboration strategies: (1) agent governance, (2) participation control, (3) interaction dynamics, and (4) dialogue history management. Through rigorous experimentation under two context-dependent scenarios: Distributed Evidence Integration (DEI) and Structured Evidence Synthesis (SES), we quantify the impact of these strategies on both task accuracy and computational efficiency. Our findings reveal that centralized governance, instructor-led participation, ordered interaction patterns, and instructor-curated context summarization collectively optimize the trade-off between decision quality and resource utilization with the support of the proposed Token-Accuracy Ratio (TAR). This work establishes a foundation for designing adaptive, scalable multi-agent systems, shifting the focus from structural novelty to strategic interaction mechanics.

Summary

  • The paper introduces collaboration strategies by examining governance, participation control, interaction dynamics, and dialogue history management in multi-agent systems.
  • It demonstrates that centralized governance with instructor-led participation optimizes the Token-Accuracy Ratio (TAR) and reduces computational token costs in clinical and evidence synthesis scenarios.
  • The study highlights the importance of context summarization and selective agent engagement to balance decision accuracy with computational efficiency.

Beyond Frameworks: Unpacking Collaboration Strategies in Multi-Agent Systems

Introduction

The paper addresses the intricacies of collaboration strategies within multi-agent systems driven by LLMs. While previous research primarily explored high-level architectures, this paper introduces a detailed examination of collaboration mechanics across four axes: governance, participation control, interaction dynamics, and dialogue history management. This analysis is significant for designing systems that efficiently balance decision quality and resource utilization.

Collaboration Dimensions

Governance

Two governance models are considered: centralized and decentralized. Centralized governance involves a supervisory agent directing interactions, maintaining structured participation, and decision authority. In contrast, decentralized governance favors autonomy, allowing agents to self-organize, which can lead to coordination challenges and inefficiencies.

Participation Control

Participation in discussions can be managed either through full participation, with all agents involved, or selective participation, where only relevant agents are active. While selective participation optimizes efficiency, it risks excluding valuable perspectives.

Interaction Dynamics

Agents can interact following patterns such as simultaneous communication, one-by-one ordered interaction, random sequences, or selective point-to-point communication. Each pattern influences the clarity of information exchange and the consensus speed among agents.

Context Management

Effective context management involves deciding between retaining all dialogue history or using summarized context to balance situational awareness and computational efficiency. Summarization can be self-managed by each agent or overseen by a centralized authority.

Experimental Scenarios and Results

The paper evaluates the discussed strategies in two distinct contexts: Distributed Evidence Integration (DEI) and Structured Evidence Synthesis (SES).

DEI Scenario

In this context, agents must collaboratively integrate distributed clinical data to predict patient discharge dispositions. The results indicate that centralized governance with instructor-led participation achieves a notable reduction in token cost, optimizing computational efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.

SES Scenario

This scenario requires agents to validate claims through synthesis of evidence, emphasizing the need for effective persuasion when relevant information resides with a minority of agents. Here too, centralized governance appears beneficial, minimizing redundancies in token usage.

Token-Accuracy Ratio (TAR)

TAR, introduced in this paper, is a metric that quantifies the trade-off between decision accuracy and computational cost. The paper finds that strategies employing centralized governance with instructor-led decisions provide optimal TAR, reinforcing the value of structured control in multi-agent systems.

Implications and Future Directions

The shift from emphasizing architectural frameworks to strategically designed collaboration protocols presents significant implications for scalable multi-agent systems. Future research could explore integrating external knowledge bases for enhanced decision-making and examining the generalizability of these strategies across diverse domains.

Conclusion

The paper establishes a foundational understanding of multi-agent system collaboration, emphasizing the nuanced strategies that significantly influence both accuracy and efficiency. Centralized governance, with sequential participation and contextual summarization, is highlighted as particularly effective. These insights are crucial for advancing the deployment of adaptive, context-dependent systems in real-world applications.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.