Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Batch, match, and patch: low-rank approximations for score-based variational inference (2410.22292v2)

Published 29 Oct 2024 in stat.ML, cs.LG, and stat.CO

Abstract: Black-box variational inference (BBVI) scales poorly to high-dimensional problems when it is used to estimate a multivariate Gaussian approximation with a full covariance matrix. In this paper, we extend the batch-and-match (BaM) framework for score-based BBVI to problems where it is prohibitively expensive to store such covariance matrices, let alone to estimate them. Unlike classical algorithms for BBVI, which use stochastic gradient descent to minimize the reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence, BaM uses more specialized updates to match the scores of the target density and its Gaussian approximation. We extend the updates for BaM by integrating them with a more compact parameterization of full covariance matrices. In particular, borrowing ideas from factor analysis, we add an extra step to each iteration of BaM--a patch--that projects each newly updated covariance matrix into a more efficiently parameterized family of diagonal plus low rank matrices. We evaluate this approach on a variety of synthetic target distributions and real-world problems in high-dimensional inference.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Statistical and computational trade-offs in variational inference: A case study in inferential model selection. arXiv eprint 2207.11208, 2022.
  2. Variational inference: A review for statisticians. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112(518):859–877, 2017.
  3. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018.
  4. EigenVI: score-based variational inference with orthogonal function expansions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, to appear, 2024a.
  5. Batch and match: black-box variational inference with a score-based divergence. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024b.
  6. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of changepoint problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 41(2):389–405, 1992.
  7. A. Gelman and J. Hill. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  8. Z. Ghahramani and G. E. Hinton. The EM algorithm for mixtures of factor analyzers. Technical report, Technical Report CRG-TR-96-1, University of Toronto, 1996.
  9. Structured stochastic variational inference. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 361–369, 2015.
  10. An introduction to variational methods for graphical models. Machine Learning, 37:183–233, 1999.
  11. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015.
  12. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014.
  13. Provably scalable black-box variational inference with structured variational families. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024.
  14. Automatic differentiation variational inference. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2017.
  15. Variational boosting: Iteratively refining posterior approximations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2420–2429. PMLR, 2017.
  16. Variational inference with Gaussian score matching. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2023.
  17. Log Gaussian Cox processes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 25(3):451–482, 1998.
  18. Elliptical slice sampling. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 9, pages 541–548, 2010.
  19. Automated variational inference for Gaussian process models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2014.
  20. Gaussian variational approximation with a factor covariance structure. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27(3):465–478, 2018.
  21. The matrix cookbook. Technical University of Denmark, 7(15):510, 2008.
  22. Black box variational inference. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 814–822. PMLR, 2014.
  23. EM algorithms for ML factor analysis. Psychometrika, 47:69–76, 1982.
  24. L. Saul and M. Jordan. Exploiting tractable substructures in intractable networks. Advances in Neural Information processing Systems, 8, 1995.
  25. Maximum likelihood and minimum classification error factor analysis for automatic speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(2):115–125, 2000.
  26. Gaussian variational approximation with sparse precision matrices. Statistics and Computing, 28:259–275, 2018.
  27. M. Titsias and M. Lázaro-Gredilla. Doubly stochastic variational Bayes for non-conjugate inference. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2014.
  28. Efficient low rank Gaussian variational inference for neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:4610–4622, 2020.
  29. Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 1(1–2):1–305, 2008.
  30. Variational approximations using Fisher divergence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05284, 2019.
  31. Variational Hamiltonian Monte Carlo via score matching. Bayesian Analysis, 13(2):485, 2018.

Summary

  • The paper introduces an EM-inspired patch step within the Batch-and-Match algorithm to form a diagonal plus low-rank covariance structure that reduces complexity in high-dimensional inference.
  • The methodology transforms dense covariance updates into linear-complexity operations, dramatically improving scalability and convergence compared to traditional BBVI.
  • Empirical results on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate enhanced inference quality and stability for high-dimensional Gaussian targets and Cox process models.

Overview of Low-Rank Approximation Methods for Score-Based Variational Inference

The paper under discussion explores advancements in the field of variational inference, specifically targeting the limitations of Black-Box Variational Inference (BBVI) when applied to high-dimensional distributions with complex covariance structures. The authors propose an enhancement of the existing Batch-and-Match (BaM) algorithm, introducing what they term as a "patch" to maintain efficiency and scalability in processing high-dimensional data. The focus of their work is on improving the covariance estimation by integrating low-rank approximations, consequently enabling the effective application of BBVI in large-scale inference problems.

Conceptual Framework

The fundamental challenge addressed in this research is the inefficiency of BBVI in managing high-dimensional data, particularly when such data requires the computation and storage of dense covariance matrices. Traditional gradient descent methods used in BBVI to minimize the reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence become computationally prohibitive as dimensionality increases. To mitigate this challenge, the authors extend the BaM framework with a novel integration strategy that projects dense covariance matrices into a more manageable form, characterized by a diagonal plus low-rank structure. This structuring is analogous to factor analysis models, which facilitate the representation of large covariance matrices through a combination of diagonal and low-rank matrices. The introduced "patch" in the BaM updates aligns with the maximum likelihood estimation methods employed in factor analysis but is adapted to variational inference.

Methodological Advancements

The modified BaM algorithm, now incorporating a patch step, transforms the original covariance update into one that fits within a structured family of low-rank and diagonal matrices. This transformation is achieved through an Expectation-Maximization (EM) inspired algorithm, which ensures that each iterative update of the covariance matrix reduces computational complexity from quadratic to linear concerning dimensionality. Notably, the EM-based patch projection aims to minimize the KL divergence between the intermediate dense covariance and the updated structured covariance. The authors assert that this leads to improved scalability and convergence rates across diverse inference tasks.

Empirical Evaluation and Results

Empirical validation of the proposed method is conducted on a range of synthetic and real-world high-dimensional datasets. The researchers evaluate the performance of the patched BaM (pBaM) algorithm against traditional and structured BBVI methods, highlighting the superior convergence speed and stability of pBaM. Their experiments demonstrate notable enhancements in inference quality for high-dimensional Gaussian targets and logistic Gaussian Cox processes. Importantly, the pBaM method achieves this efficiency without compromising on the accuracy of variational approximation, showcasing its potential as a practical tool in scenarios where data dimensionality presents a significant computational burden.

Implications and Future Work

The implications of this work are manifold, influencing both theoretical advancements in variational inference and practical applications in fields dealing with large-scale data. The introduction of structured covariance estimation through low-rank approximations aids in circumventing the prohibitive memory and computation constraints posed by high dimensions. Further, the adaptability of the algorithm to varying rank structures of covariance suggests its utility in dynamic and iterative data environments.

Looking forward, the authors propose extending this research to encompass more complex and diverse structured variational families. Potential adaptations might include variations of the covariance structure to incorporate sparsity or block-diagonal patterns, thereby enhancing the versatility and application range of variational inference techniques. Additionally, the exploration of adaptive rank-increasing strategies could further optimize the approximation quality in dynamically evolving datasets.

In conclusion, this paper presents a significant step towards addressing the computational challenges inherent in score-based BBVI, offering a robust methodology through the incorporation of low-rank approximations. It opens avenues for further exploration in enhancing both the scalability and applicability of variational inference algorithms in high-dimensional settings.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 5 tweets and received 105 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: