Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Rotation Measure study of FRB 20180916B with the uGMRT (2409.12584v1)

Published 19 Sep 2024 in astro-ph.HE and astro-ph.IM

Abstract: Context. Fast Radio Burst 20180916B is a repeating FRB whose activity window has a 16.34 day periodicity that also shifts and varies in duration with the observing frequency. Recently, arxiv:2205.09221 reported the FRB has started to show secular Rotation Measure (RM) increasing trend after only showing stochastic variability around a constant value of $-114.6$ rad m${-2}$ since its discovery. Aims. We aim to further study the RM variability of FRB 20180916B. The data comes from the ongoing campaigns of FRB 20180916B using the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (uGMRT). The majority of the observations are in Band 4, which is centered at 650 MHz with 200 MHz bandwidth. Methods. We apply a standard single pulse search pipeline to search for bursts. In total, we detect 116 bursts with $\sim$36 hours of on-source time spanning 1200 days, with two bursts detected during simultaneous frequency coverage observations. We develop and apply a polarization calibration strategy suited for our dataset. On the calibrated bursts, we use QU-fitting to measure RM. Lastly, we also measure various other properties such as rate, linear polarization fraction and fluence distribution. Results. Of the 116 detected bursts, we could calibrate 79 of them. From which, we observed in our early observations the RM continued to follow linear trend as modeled by arxiv:2205.09221. However, our later observations suggest the source switch from the linear trend to stochastic variations around a constant value of $-58.75$ rad m${-2}$. We also study cumulative rate against fluence and note that rate at higher fluences (> 1.2 Jy ms) scales as $\gamma = -1.09(7)$ whereas that at lower fluences (between 0.2 and 1.2 Jy ms) only scales as $\gamma = -0.51(1)$, meaning rate at higher fluence regime is steeper than at lower fluence regime.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com