Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 85 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 72 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 170 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Building Semi-Analytic Black Hole Seeding Models Using IllustrisTNG Host Galaxies (2309.11324v1)

Published 20 Sep 2023 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Because early black holes (BHs) grew to $\sim10{9} ~M_\odot$ in less than 1 Gyr of cosmic time, BH seeding models face stringent constraints. To efficiently constrain the parameter space of possible seeding criteria, we combine the advantages of the cosmological IllustrisTNG (TNG) simulations with the flexibility of semi-analytic modeling. We identify TNG galaxies as BH seeding sites based on various criteria including a minimum gas mass of $107$-$109~M_\odot$, total host mass of $10{8.5}$-$10{10.5}~M_\odot$, and a maximum gas metallicity of $0.01 - 0.1 ~Z_\odot$. Each potential host is assigned a BH seed with a probability of $0.01 - 1$; these BHs are then traced through the TNG galaxy merger tree. This approach improves upon the predictive power of the simple TNG BH seeding prescription, especially in the low-mass regime at high redshift, and it is readily adaptable to other cosmological simulations. Most of our seed models predict $z\lesssim4$ BH mass densities that are consistent with empirical data as well as the TNG BHs. However, high-redshift BH number densities can differ by factors of $\sim$ 10 - 100 between models. In most models, $\lesssim105~M_\odot$ BHs substantially outnumber heavier BHs at high redshifts. Mergers between such BHs are prime targets for gravitational-wave detection with LISA. The $z=0$ BH mass densities in most models agree well with observations, but our strictest seeding criteria fail at high redshift. Our findings strongly motivate the need for better empirical constraints on high-$z$ BHs, and they underscore the significance of recent AGN discoveries with JWST.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube