Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Did you miss it? Automatic lung nodule detection combined with gaze information improves radiologists' screening performance (1910.03986v1)

Published 9 Oct 2019 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Early diagnosis of lung cancer via computed tomography can significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality rates associated with the pathology. However, search lung nodules is a high complexity task, which affects the success of screening programs. Whilst computer-aided detection systems can be used as second observers, they may bias radiologists and introduce significant time overheads. With this in mind, this study assesses the potential of using gaze information for integrating automatic detection systems in the clinical practice. For that purpose, 4 radiologists were asked to annotate 20 scans from a public dataset while being monitored by an eye tracker device and an automatic lung nodule detection system was developed. Our results show that radiologists follow a similar search routine and tend to have lower fixation periods in regions where finding errors occur. The overall detection sensitivity of the specialists was 0.67$\pm$0.07, whereas the system achieved 0.69. Combining the annotations of one radiologist with the automatic system significantly improves the detection performance to similar levels of two annotators. Likewise, combining the findings of radiologist with the detection algorithm only for low fixation regions still significantly improves the detection sensitivity without increasing the number of false-positives. The combination of the automatic system with the gaze information allows to mitigate possible errors of the radiologist without some of the issues usually associated with automatic detection system.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Guilherme Aresta (19 papers)
  2. Carlos Ferreira (7 papers)
  3. João Pedrosa (6 papers)
  4. Teresa Araújo (12 papers)
  5. João Rebelo (2 papers)
  6. Eduardo Negrão (2 papers)
  7. Margarida Morgado (1 paper)
  8. Filipe Alves (1 paper)
  9. António Cunha (5 papers)
  10. Isabel Ramos (3 papers)
  11. Aurélio Campilho (16 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.