Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 79 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 85 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 431 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 186 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

KiDS+GAMA: Constraints on Horndeski gravity from combined large-scale structure probes (1901.03686v2)

Published 11 Jan 2019 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We present constraints on Horndeski gravity from a combined analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering from $450\,\mathrm{deg}2$ of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. The Horndeski class of dark energy/modified gravity models includes the majority of universally coupled extensions to $\Lambda$CDM with one scalar field in addition to the metric. We study the functions of time that fully describe the evolution of linear perturbations in Horndeski gravity. Our results are compatible throughout with a $\Lambda$CDM model. By imposing gravitational wave constraints, we fix the tensor speed excess to zero and consider a subset of models including e.g. quintessence and $f(R)$ theories. Assuming proportionality of the Horndeski functions $\alpha_B$ and $\alpha_M$ (kinetic braiding and the Planck mass run rate, respectively) to the dark energy density fraction $\Omega_{\mathrm{DE}}(a) = 1 - \Omega_{\mathrm{m}}(a)$, we find for the proportionality coefficients $\hat{\alpha}B = 0.20{-0.33}{+0.20} \,$ and $\, \hat{\alpha}M = 0.25{-0.29}{+0.19}$. Our value of $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3}$ is in better agreement with the $Planck$ estimate when measured in the enlarged Horndeski parameter space than in a pure $\Lambda$CDM scenario. In our joint three-probe analysis we report a downward shift of the $S_8$ best fit value from the $Planck$ measurement of $\Delta S_8 = 0.016_{-0.046}{+0.048}$ in Horndeski gravity, compared to $\Delta S_8 = 0.059_{-0.039}{+0.040}$ in $\Lambda$CDM. Our constraints are robust to the modelling uncertainty of the non-linear matter power spectrum in Horndeski gravity. Our likelihood code for multi-probe analysis in both $\Lambda$CDM and Horndeski gravity is publicly available at http://github.com/alessiospuriomancini/KiDSHorndeski .

Citations (49)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.