Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 435 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Statistical Analysis of Torus and Kink Instabilities in Solar Eruptions (1808.08924v1)

Published 27 Aug 2018 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: A recent laboratory experiment of ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities reveals four distinct eruption regimes readily distinguished by the torus instability (TI) and helical kink instability (KI) parameters \citep{Myers2015}. To establish its observational counterpart, we collect 38 solar flares (stronger than GOES class M5 in general) that took place within 45${\circ}$ of disk center during 2011$-$2017, 26 of which are associated with a halo or partial halo coronal mass ejection (CME) (i.e., ejective events), while the others are CMEless (i.e., confined events). This is a complete sample of solar events satisfying our selection criteria detailed in the paper. For each event, we calculate decay index $n$ of the potential strapping field above the magnetic flux rope (MFR) in and around the flaring magnetic polarity inversion line (a TI parameter), and the unsigned twist number $T_w$ of the non-linear force-free (NLFF) field lines forming the same MFR (a KI parameter). We then construct a $n-T_w$ diagram to investigate how the eruptiveness depends on these parameters. We find: (1) $T_w$ appears to play little role in discriminating between confined and ejective events; (2) the events with $n\gtrsim0.8$ are all ejective and all confined events have $n\lesssim0.8$. However, $n\gtrsim0.8$ is not a necessary condition for eruption, because some events with $n\lesssim0.8$ also erupted. In addition, we investigate the MFR's geometrical parameters, apex height and distance between footpoints, as a possible factor for the eruptiveness. We briefly discuss the difference of the present result for solar eruptions with that of the laboratory result in terms of the role played by magnetic reconnection.

Citations (47)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.